My point is that we should be able to get better players than a program like UNLV. How do you possibly take that as "we should get better players, but suck underachieve with them"? Even with Hoiberg, we were trying to get good high school players. We just couldn't get that many so we went the JUCO and transfer route. The transfer market has been watered down a lot in the last couple years because pretty much every school wants them now. It has become a lot harder to get the top transfers.
No one has even said we need to get more high school players, just that its frustrating to see inferior programs land more top 100 players than us year after year.
We are debating why we seem to struggle getting more top high school players, not if we should try to get more high school players.
Isn't it apparent that we do? This is what I'm not understanding. Or are you just being a star chaser?