***OFFICIAL AVENGERS ENDGAME SPOILER THREAD WITHOUT PERSONAL ATTACKS***

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,965
41,694
113
Waukee
We need to remember the most heroic character of them all.

49096


No rat in Antman's van, then no movie.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,893
25,031
113
So to try and get this on track...

I still don't get their time travel explanation. So if they go back and affect the past, it's an alternate timeline and won't affect their own timeline. Yet when Can goes back at the end, he stays in the past timeline yet shows up in the current timeline. He shouldn't exist at all in their current timeline after going back. He should grow old in the alternate timeline and thus never had the opportunity to be sitting their giving the shield to Sam.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,965
41,694
113
Waukee
So to try and get this on track...

I still don't get their time travel explanation. So if they go back and affect the past, it's an alternate timeline and won't affect their own timeline. Yet when Can goes back at the end, he stays in the past timeline yet shows up in the current timeline. He shouldn't exist at all in their current timeline after going back. He should grow old in the alternate timeline and thus never had the opportunity to be sitting their giving the shield to Sam.

Oh no you said something bad about Endgame.

Prepare for an artillery barrage of nerd rage.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
So to try and get this on track...

I still don't get their time travel explanation. So if they go back and affect the past, it's an alternate timeline and won't affect their own timeline. Yet when Can goes back at the end, he stays in the past timeline yet shows up in the current timeline. He shouldn't exist at all in their current timeline after going back. He should grow old in the alternate timeline and thus never had the opportunity to be sitting their giving the shield to Sam.

Yeah I know.

This is always the problem with time travel movies when the characters attempt to change something that happens at an earlier time. There's no way around it. In Endgame, they even make fun of this fact by referencing all the other movies with time travel rules in them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CycoCyclone

CYme

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2011
4,025
746
113
Pella, IA
So to try and get this on track...

I still don't get their time travel explanation. So if they go back and affect the past, it's an alternate timeline and won't affect their own timeline. Yet when Can goes back at the end, he stays in the past timeline yet shows up in the current timeline. He shouldn't exist at all in their current timeline after going back. He should grow old in the alternate timeline and thus never had the opportunity to be sitting their giving the shield to Sam.

He came to the main movie timeline using his fancy bracelet. Only explanation I can think of other than the main timeline being a branch where old cap was always present. Maybe we see old cap working in the background in future movies (black widow origin?)
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: CycoCyclone

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,893
25,031
113
He came to the main movie timeline using his fancy bracelet. Only explanation I can think of other than the main timeline being a branch where old cap was always present. Maybe we see old cap working in the background in future movies (black widow origin?)

If he had used his bracelet, he would have returned to the platform. According to their explanation, only traveling through the quantum realm would get them to return to their reality.

It's a small thing, but it just seemed like the movie broke a lot of it's own rules to get things to wrap up easily.
 

CYme

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2011
4,025
746
113
Pella, IA
If he had used his bracelet, he would have returned to the platform. According to their explanation, only traveling through the quantum realm would get them to return to their reality.

It's a small thing, but it just seemed like the movie broke a lot of it's own rules to get things to wrap up easily.
Shhhhh, can't say that, you'll be attacked.

That said, Tony and cap used theirs to travel from New York to the base in both time and space, we probably don't know all of the capabilities of the bracelet.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,965
41,694
113
Waukee
One more reason I like Thanos --

He totally won. He beat the Avengers so hard that they had to resort to fourth wall-breaking, plot coherence-ruining gimmicks like time travel to defeat him.

Thanos was so powerful and mighty the writers wrote themselves into a corner and had to resort to the "break in case of plot emergency" glass to fix it.
 

tm3308

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2010
8,191
1,609
113
One more reason I like Thanos --

He totally won. He beat the Avengers so hard that they had to resort to fourth wall-breaking, plot coherence-ruining gimmicks like time travel to defeat him.

Thanos was so powerful and mighty the writers wrote themselves into a corner and had to resort to the "break in case of plot emergency" glass to fix it.

You say this as if this wasn't always their plan, and they just realized after Infinity War that they might have ****** up. The knew where the story was going a long time ago (that's why we got our first taste of the quantum realm four freaking years ago).
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,965
41,694
113
Waukee
You say this as if this wasn't always their plan, and they just realized after Infinity War that they might have ****** up. The knew where the story was going a long time ago (that's why we got our first taste of the quantum realm four freaking years ago).

Oh, I am sure they planned it long ago.

That does not change the fact they wrote Thanos and his plan so well up to that point that they had to resort to a gimmicky time travel plot to eventually get around it, though.

The Avengers lost, and hard, and only by cheating conventional bounds of story structure and plot cohesion -- just go back in time and change things! -- could they somehow win.
 
Last edited:

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,905
66,374
113
LA LA Land
Finally saw just now. Pretty awesome movie, way more fan service than I ever thought possible but the lesson might be that even casual fans like fan service.

As a fanatic fan of the original comics this story is based on (probably read it a dozen times) I doubt anyone was more shocked by the story than me. Infinity War and some of the previous movies followed the comic book story more or less and I wasn't surprised at all with the snap...Endgame was all completely new at least in terms of not using any story from the early 90s Infinity Gauntlet comic story.

I got to see the "space suits" that I now know are "time travel suits" over a year ago working on product development...so knowing that the final comic book battle against Thanos takes place in space I was 99.9999999% sure we were going to see some outerspace Thanos showdown. Awesome surprise to be so wrong and so entertained. I'm going to look back at my old correspondence but I think we were even told they were space suits as misdirection.

I did have one time on some graphic work where I was directed to use Hawkeye and Widow next to each other where I previously had Hulk and Widow next to each other...now I know why.

One other thing...I didn't find either Ant-Man movie particularly funny (as opposed to both Guardians movies I did find hilarious) but the Ant-Man lines in this movie were hilarious and every one of them landed. If there were to ever be a third Ant-Man movie they need whoever wrote the characters lines in this one.
 
Last edited:

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,905
66,374
113
LA LA Land
Oh, I am sure they planned it long ago.

That does not change the fact they wrote Thanos and his plan so well up to that point that they had to resort to a gimmicky time travel plot to eventually get around it, though.

The Avengers lost, and hard, and only by cheating conventional bounds of story structure and plot cohesion -- just go back in time and change things! -- could they somehow win.

Comic books themselves are gimmicky plots and far fetched non-scientific non-realistic scenarios. When they bring dead characters back to life that's a comic book staple too. Nothing would be more "comic book" than having another Iron Man movie even after the last scenes of Endgame.

In this '90-'91 comic story (Thanos Quest 1-2, Infinity Gauntlet 1-6) the "snap" is the half way point of a story that does not involve time travel. After Thanos defeats the half of the heroes that are left in a space battle about a dozen cosmic gods join forces to battle him (Galactus and others like him), Thanos defeats the gods, in doing so he becomes the embodiment of the entire universe rendering his physical form obsolete because he is all reality at once...in this initial moment of realization he forgets about his physical form with a barely alive tortured disgusting Nebula very near the gauntlet, she grabs it and chaos ensues with a sort of free for all.

I suspect that outerspace god battle I just described would turn off religious people and may not have filmed well, instead time travel was a fun device for what is the ultimate popcorn movie that doesn't intend to be The Godfather or 2001.
 

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,270
26,180
113
Minneapolis
Can I make assholish personal attacks in here if they're directed at myself?

I wanted to contribute something since I haven't seen the movie and am still probably a couple of weeks away from seeing it.