*** Official #12 IOWA STATE vs #17 BYU Game(Day) Thread ***

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,321
4,370
113
Arlington, TX
I guess we just have to accept what we are right now defensively. If some tourney team somehow shoots 18-36 from 3 against us, however unlikely that seems, we just tip our hat to them. I don't forsee that happening, but we are Iowa State.
As you get further into the tourney, you should expect better 3pt shooting from the opponent. In the E8 and F4, I would expect the opponent to drain the majority of the wide open looks. Not having a plan to defend against that is pretty much throwing in the towel.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: FinalFourCy

Jayshellberg

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 4, 2016
1,805
3,622
113
59
Omaha
Houston’s defense is just on another level as ISU’s. They largely play man-to-man defense and rarely give up open three-point shots. Nearly all of BYU’s three-point shots yesterday were uncontested. Plus, BYU had no success driving and kicking the ball out today because their ball handlers couldn’t beat Houston’s defenders. This allowed Houston to keep its defenders on the perimeter, near the three point line.

It wasn’t that BYU’s players were better three pointers yesterday. Rather, it was that BYU’s three point looks were highly contested today and yesterday they were not.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,435
10,160
113
41
I remember people #itching about the 3-point defense last year. Really all 3 previous TJ years. Giving up 3s is a consequence of the defense that pressures everywhere. Most times it doesn't result in 18-36.
Sometimes it results in 29 forced turnovers.

We’ve arrived.

Another Top 10 defense and we’re analyzing an exhibition game without our two best perimeter defenders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NENick

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,264
55,155
113
Houston’s defense is just on another level as ISU’s. They largely play man-to-man defense and rarely give up open three-point shots. Nearly all of BYU’s three-point shots yesterday were uncontested. Plus, BYU had no success driving and kicking the ball out today because their ball handlers couldn’t beat Houston’s defenders. This allowed Houston to keep its defenders on the perimeter, near the three point line.

It wasn’t that BYU’s players were better three pointers yesterday. Rather, it was that BYU’s three point looks were highly contested today and yesterday they were not.

They still were hitting at a crazy clip though.

Like they could shoot those same shots in shoot around/skeleton and not hit that well.

Either way most teams have weaknesses and one of ISU's is chasing off the arc, healthy or not.
 

Bestaluckcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 25, 2009
2,174
1,611
113
Watching it live, it appeared to me that Houston did a better job of guarding BYU overall. I will say that Houston struggled with that early. Those early open looks for BYU that rimmed in on Thursday rimmed out last night. BYU just could not miss on Thursday, and we had trouble getting to their fourth option and containing Saunders. That is where we missed having our starters.

I would have loved to see the ISU/BYU game played with the officiating crew from the Houston game. The same thing that BYU did Thursday was a travel call last night. BYU likes to be overly physical away from the ball. If that never gets called like on Thursday it can get them some wide open shots. BYU took a page from Huggy ball for when they play their defense. The officials don’t call them all. Jmo