No one talking about Railey...?

[Cyclone1985]

Not having JR hurt this team tonight.

Shots were obviously not falling, so you need to go inside. Having Railey and RW doing work inside would have been huge.

Albeit, RW only shot 3-8 from the line, but still.

Not to mention Railey has a sweet 10 foot jumper.

 

[Cyclonepride]

Well, we did go to the White/Booker combination, but I think you have to get it inside in the right position for that to work (and you can't have refs calling charges every time you go into the lane hard).

 

[cyclonepower]

wonder if he would have joined the missed layup parade?

 

[Senolcyc]

Not having JR hurt this team tonight.

Shots were obviously not falling, so you need to go inside. Having Railey and RW doing work inside would have been huge.

Albeit, RW only shot 3-8 from the line, but still.

Not to mention Railey has a sweet 10 foot jumper.

Drake was without Van Deest and Uehlenhopp. If every player is available for both teams for this imaginary game, it might be a 15 or 20 point loss instead of just 9.

 

[Rabbuk]

he certainly would have contributed an impressive 2 points,2 rebounds and 4+ fouls.

 

[IowaStateClones]

I'm actually exited to see if we get a chance at seeing a lineup with Railey, Booker, and White.

 

[IcSyU]

I'm actually exited to see if we get a chance at seeing a lineup with Railey, Booker, and White.

Why? So we automatically give up 2 points every possession because none of the above are interested in playing defense? Or the part where we'd have a max of two guys on the floor who can dribble.

A 2-3 zone would neutralize any lineup with Railey, Booker, and White in a heartbeat.

 

[ISUCyclone06]

Railey will not see the court in most games...maybe to foul.

 

[twojman]

he certainly would have contributed an impressive 2 points,2 rebounds and 4+ fouls.

Ding!