Such a good looking logo.
I don't know, kind of mean and scary, needs to smile more. You know, be more welcoming, kind and gentle.
I am looking forward to the pink and purple fuzzy hok.
Such a good looking logo.
As opposed to putting asterisks on 99% of your games like ISU??
Thanks for the s/o GodNo, I would say Jesus or John Walters is the voice of the Cyclone fan base. You guys have @cyLKUIF or Jon Miller, I'll let you decide
I was waiting for Cytwins mildly autistic little brother to chime in. The fact you spent time out of your day to dig up 5% of my posting history that triggered you is a little sad.
This made me laugh way too hard. Well done!I was waiting for Cytwins mildly autistic little brother to chime in. The fact you spent time out of your day to dig up 5% of my posting history that triggered you is a little sad.
I was waiting for Cytwins mildly autistic little brother to chime in. The fact you spent time out of your day to dig up 5% of my posting history that triggered you is a little sad.
It doesn't matter what you call me. I'll keep being honest, you keep getting Hawkeye fans panties in a bunch.Don't get all butthurt because you're not good at trolling. For future reference if you want to pretend to be an ISU fan don't defend little bro so much
It doesn't matter what you call me. I'll keep being honest, you keep getting Hawkeye fans panties in a bunch.
You're still here? Haven't you made an ass of yourself enough in this thread? BrahIf your panties keep bunching up, best to go to vickys and ask for new ones. I can't help because I don't wear panties. But I ain't judging bro.
It doesn't matter what you call me. I'll keep being honest, you keep getting Hawkeye fans panties in a bunch.
He'll always be a cyclone. Seems KJ might be getting the ship righted finally. Some talented kids coming in.If you're going to be honest you should probably change your profile pic
You're still here? Haven't you made an ass of yourself enough in this thread? Brah
Like that Daniels was suspended? Or that he went from "edge of being good" to "very good" in about 5 posts? Or all the stupid penalties he gets, even though he had a whopping three last year, while Raji had five? Or that the Green Bay coaching staff has no input in who they should retain for their O-Line? Sounds like you need better info from your friends.I don't live here. Most isu fans move around in here, don't anchor down. Just because I have friends who give me info and don't read it out of mags, I always feel comfortable with my info.
He'll always be a cyclone. Seems KJ might be getting the ship righted finally. Some talented kids coming in.
Like that Daniels was suspended? Or that he went from "edge of being good" to "very good" in about 5 posts? Or all the stupid penalties he gets, even though he had a whopping three last year, while Raji had five? Or that the Green Bay coaching staff has no input in who they should retain for their O-Line? Sounds like you need better info from your friends.
Just so we're on the same page... without any change in skill or statistics, Daniels went from almost good to very good just because he didn't get suspended for breaking the substance abuse policy? Not sure how you interpret things, but If I were to tell one of my direct reports they are on the edge of being good at their job vs. they are very good at their job, seems like that changes quite a bit during their annual review. That's not really a second grade difference in semantics.I was mistaken on the suspension. That took Daniels from edge to good. If you want to play the second grade "very" game, of adding another very makes a huge difference, have fun with it. Once again, I didn't say all his dumb things were penalties. Just because someone doesn't get a penalty in a game doesn't mean it was mistake free football. You believe what else you want, I don't care if you have any faith in my sources or not.
Just so we're on the same page... without any change in skill or statistics, Daniels went from almost good to very good just because he didn't get suspended for breaking the substance abuse policy? Not sure how you interpret things, but If I were to tell one of my direct reports they are on the edge of being good at their job vs. they are very good at their job, seems like that changes quite a bit during their annual review. That's not really a second grade difference in semantics.
Daniels and Bulaga both suck. Just end it there