3 years doesn't exactly equal 13 years geneous, especially in the difference of position.
3 misses compared to over 50. He's proving my point
3 years doesn't exactly equal 13 years geneous, especially in the difference of position.
I can, most of them are unemployed though after leaving ISU.
Are you seriously this dumb? Matt Campbell has been at ISU for 3 years. Your comparisons are just so pathetic.Why does it need to be 3 years? I am just trying to understand the rationale for Phil Parker being bad and missing on recruits.... and I just do not see it. When he is sending guys to the league over 75% of the time he is at Iowa. So chances are high if you commit to Iowa as a DB you will get looked at to be drafted or signed as a UFA, as long as you do your part the 3 or 4 years you are at Iowa.
Why does it need to be 3 years? I am just trying to understand the rationale for Phil Parker being bad and missing on recruits.... and I just do not see it. When he is sending guys to the league over 75% of the time he is at Iowa. So chances are high if you commit to Iowa as a DB you will get looked at to be drafted or signed as a UFA, as long as you do your part the 3 or 4 years you are at Iowa.
Again:Why does it need to be 3 years? I am just trying to understand the rationale for Phil Parker being bad and missing on recruits.... and I just do not see it. When he is sending guys to the league over 75% of the time he is at Iowa. So chances are high if you commit to Iowa as a DB you will get looked at to be drafted or signed as a UFA, as long as you do your part the 3 or 4 years you are at Iowa.
maybe in terms of coordinator, I can agree, but PP is better than him collectively.Parker and Rhoads is actually a great comparison
maybe in terms of coordinator, I can agree, but PP is better than him collectively.
No we do not have to do that, I was adding into the fact that he gets guys drafted as DB over 75% of the time he has been at Iowa and more have been signed as UFA, if we do WR, we have to go that route for ISU too with Campbell success.Wait, you are factoring in UFA's now? JFC!
Chevin Calloway disagrees
No we do not have to do that, I was adding into the fact that he gets guys drafted as DB over 75% of the time he has been at Iowa and more have been signed as UFA, if we do WR, we have to go that route for ISU too with Campbell success.
Chevin Calloway disagrees
Can someone just accept this guy into the popular kids club so he feels acceptedAgain:
Ok? You are really reaching right now. Must be hard for you to give credit to anything Iowa, and I am not sure your stance.
Josh Jackson agree’s with him.
Are you going all Stuart Smalley?Can someone just accept this guy into the popular kids club so he feels accepted
A, as in singular?Twins just sped right through Insecurityville and is now firmly parked in Grumpytown. Crazy that a retread hok troll can swoop in and ruin what had been his really solid day.
yes the responses are coming in where you are all "smarter" but have nothing to add, because there really is nothing for you guys to add. The history of the program and current trajectory of the program are in really good shape under Kirk, recruiting, development, and even game day planning is improving. Young Coaching is starting to preform wonders in recruiting.Classic! You're on a roll, keep going.
All I'm saying is if Phil Parker offers you most likely you're going to be a miss
Most likely how? His track record for DBs is better than a lot of top 25 programsAll I'm saying is if Phil Parker offers you most likely you're going to be a miss