Link to your old username?Link to the HR guys proven to be consistently wrong?
Link to your old username?Link to the HR guys proven to be consistently wrong?
It is being reported that you have no proof of this offer.
Link to your old username?
Link to the HR guys proven to be consistently wrong?
I agree he has no offer that he could actually commit to if he wanted to.There’s never proof of any offer (until the kid actually signs with a particular school). Literally every offer that is reported, you are either taking the recruit’s word for it or a recruiting analyst’s word for it.
Why are you so afraid?Link to the first 100 times you asked me that question? Maybe if you ask it 100 more I’ll tell you.
Is this serious?
Why are you so afraid?
I agree he has no offer that he could actually commit to if he wanted to.
Sounds just like Brock Purdy then!
Yes, it is. I’d love you to show me where Blair has been proven to be consistently wrong, particularly with regard to reporting offers of Iowa recruits. TIA.
Sounds just like Brock Purdy then!
Weren't Blair and Tom the ring leaders of the mass exodus of transfers last year in basketball? I know Blair was on the Cook is for sure gone train
My fav is fending off Michigan even though they never offered a kid.Remember when you said Stanley is better than Purdy? Lol
My fav is fending off Michigan even though they never offered a kid.
Nope, that was Tom Kakert
He was wrong about Brock too
That was both of them IIRC. I do agree Kakert is wrong way more than Blair but Kakert is wrong more than anyone really so that's not saying much
My fav is fending off Michigan even though they never offered a kid.
Wrong. Brock didn’t have many offers left to choose from by the time he committed- IIRC Iowa State, Minnesota and Purdue were the only schools that stuck with Brock.