Please elaborate more. It's half of the game.
It wasn't good as a true freshman.
Please elaborate more. It's half of the game.
What teams roster would you rather have going forward?
How not good? If you rattled off offensive stats, please do some for D.It wasn't good as a true freshman.
How not good? If you rattled off offensive stats, please do some for D.
You act like you don't know what's coming and I'm not sure why
That's fine, and I get it because how well Luka is playing now. But do you think Fran's track record at the time for development was good?
You just need to pick a team. It's not a difficult question to understand.
You don't think the February fade is coming? It's happened with much better teams than one that starts the back court of Joe Toussaint and Connor McCaffrey
Schedule definitely gets harder in February.
None of those Fran teams had a possible first team All American on it.
Actually it did with Uthoff
None of them had Connor McCaffrey and Joe Toussaint starting for them either
Uthoff wasn't a first teamer, not even close.
So is that a yes or a no? I'm not trolling or arguing, just asking if you think Fran had a good track record at developing players?Well he did take 4 guys that were lower ranked recruits than Garza and made them 1st team all conference players.
He was on the cover of Sports illustrated the first week of February before the Fran fade
So is that a yes or a no? I'm not trolling or arguing, just asking if you think Fran had a good track record at developing players?
Kirk obviously and rightfully so gets a lot of credit for developing football players, haven't heard much about Fran doing it.
Uthoff was considered a first team All American going into February the year they had the Fran fade
How'd you disagree with this @HawkJRP? I just posted an article from Jan 25th that said Iowa was a projected 1 seed and Uthoff was a potential first team All American
None of those Fran teams had a possible first team All American on it.