Cowherd rips Iowa
- Thread starter CarrollCyclone
- Start date
Why does Notre Dame get credit for playing Texas this year??
Cowherd is an absolute moron anyway. He is trolling Iowa because their fans will make a big deal out of it. Many of them search for media takes about the Hawkeyes that they can be offended by. And Cowherd knows this
Cowherd is an absolute moron anyway. He is trolling Iowa because their fans will make a big deal out of it. Many of them search for media takes about the Hawkeyes that they can be offended by. And Cowherd knows this
He has a point. Unfortunately that extends to Baylor and OSU too at this point but they can make up for it in conference. Iowa can't. I mean honestly, ISu is probably in the middle of their schedule, strength wise.
He did this in 2009 as well. If it's not USC, Texas, ND, New England Patriots, Yankees, Red Sox, etc., he doesn't buy it. The guy is an absolute moron. If Cowherd is ****** about Iowa, I'm happy.
I don't like him because he's a bloviating blowhard, but you're free to enjoy that I suppose
Pretty sure the only time he's mentioned ISU football was when he said he didn't care if Iowa State went 13-0, he's not talking about them because nobody cares.
Last edited:
Comparing Iowas and ND's schedule isnt apples to apples. Also, Baylor hasnt played anyone in the non-con since forever. Other than that, he has reasonable points n matter how much I cant stand the guy.
He's not wrong in his point. Iowa hasn't played a national relevant non-conference game in a long time. Maybe 2003 when #16 Arizona State played in Iowa City? Idk
That said, it's not really relevant to the discussion of Iowa's resume. At this point in time, Iowa has a case for a top 10 or top 5 ranking. That can change and most likely will, but because Iowa scheduled Pitt instead of Alabama isn't really relevant.
That said, it's not really relevant to the discussion of Iowa's resume. At this point in time, Iowa has a case for a top 10 or top 5 ranking. That can change and most likely will, but because Iowa scheduled Pitt instead of Alabama isn't really relevant.
Instead of saying "Cowherd's and idiot" You could perhaps prove him wrong. His point is on. Iowa schedules no one while all those other teams he mentioned schedule not only good teams, but often great teams. Iowa is not the 5th best team in the country. You also can't make much of an argument they are better than anyone in the top 10. They haven't beaten a good team yet and have struggled with some marginal teams. They have no wins that signal they belong with anyone in the top 8. This isn't really arguable and he's factually right that they never play big games and he's factually right when he says everything has changed for everyone else just like Iowa. If anything he could have talked about that, in fact Iowa hasn't really had anything change in a negative way. They are in the easiest division of BCS football now and they have a schedule that dodges the best three teams in the conference. Depending on how good the Est champion is, they will get shelled either there or in a top level bowl game.
Right, but Baylor will play 3 top 15 teams in conference. Iowa won't play a team as good as the 4th best team Baylor plays until their championship game. If Iowa and any Big 12 team are undefeated and Iowa is in, the conference plans need overhauled.
Some of y'alls hatred of Iowa clouds your judgement a bit. Iowa is a good team. If they go undefeated, with out question they deserve a spot in the playoff and they would be in.
