CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
When someone makes a point with a large #, it's always good for them to back up that number.
That wasn't politically motivated on my part at all. Thanks for playing.
Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)
- Thread starter Jer
- Start date
- Status
When someone makes a point with a large #, it's always good for them to back up that number.
That wasn't politically motivated on my part at all. Thanks for playing.
From what I've experienced. I don't know why some employers are really worked up about letting people work at home if it's at least semi reasonable to do so.
If they think they won't work if they aren't "in" at work, then let them sink or swim. If they screw around, then let them go and find someone else. When this is done, there is going to be a lot of good employees looking for work. Sounds mean, but it is a chance to let those poor employees eliminate themselves.
If they think they won't work if they aren't "in" at work, then let them sink or swim. If they screw around, then let them go and find someone else. When this is done, there is going to be a lot of good employees looking for work. Sounds mean, but it is a chance to let those poor employees eliminate themselves.
I'm tired of hearing the governors and president talk. Introduce the medical professionals and let them speak.
With today's technology, there is no reason for an "office type" worker to not work from home. Also, working from home has been in place for many office workers for several years. It's just now getting more headlines. I work from home and have found that I actually work more productive efficient hours because there are less distractions. No to and from commute, much less chit chat with fellow workers, no wasted lunch hour/coffee breaks and most importantly, no work place drama. Everything is on line and can be supervised/monitored by management without physically watching employees. If an employee wants to screw around, it will catch up to them real quick.
i agree but they'll just bring up doctors who agree with them. (today's Dr. and Dr. Oz)
Well, time will tell whether she is right or wrong. Take the advice of your experts and make a decision...Kim is holding just short of a SIP until the numbers cross her red line. Next 5-7 days will tell the tale.
Are recovered cases accounted for anywhere? Active vs total cases? Not sure if that's what the diff may be
Nationally they are. But I don't know if those numbers are accurate vs. how hospitals keep track. Brought it up earlier--if someone is just sent home to quarantine after testing positive, does the hospital monitor, or just assume they're recovered after 14 days so long as they didn't die?
Sadly, the deaths are catching up with the 'recovered' numbers. Was 2:1 the other way.
https://idph.iowa.gov/Emerging-Health-Issues/Novel-Coronavirus
It won't let me copy the graph, but here is the page from the department of health. It gives hospitalized, discharged and recovering, deaths, and never hospitalized. My logic says you should add these four lines together to get the total cases, but it has always been short some.
Also how the Minn gov decided to issue his sip order :
Walz said the decision was informed by modeling by experts at the Minnesota Department of Health,
Walz said the decision was informed by modeling by experts at the Minnesota Department of Health,
Like how the number may go up and overwhelm the hospitals eventually?
Reports from other parts of the country are that it's all Covid all the time in their hospitals.
I'm trying to come up with a more useless point to make, but you've set the bar pretty high.
- Status
