Cincinnati and Memphis to the Big 12?

CyFan61

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2010
14,540
273
83
If say this happens, I dour it's a geographical split. Best guess would be an acc style split. Probably be something like this: group a, isu, ksu, okla, tex, tcu Memphis. Group b, wva, Ksu, ok state, baylor, tech, cinci. Nine game with one cross division rival played every year. So, in this case: isu vs wva, kan vs kstate, ou vs osu, tech vs tex, tcu vs Baylor and cinci vs Memphis.

Im sure u could flip flop some teams in there but something like this seems like a likely scenario. It help preserves rivalries while having two relatively equal divisions. A north south split is gonna cause a def haves vs have nots scenario which was one of the main causes of the original split that happened five years ago.

I also think an ACC-style split would be most likely if the Big 12 were ever to expand back to 12 teams. Two Texas schools per division and probably one Oklahoma school in each as well so everybody keeps that southern access for recruiting.
 

istater7

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2010
4,734
1,180
113
So what happens when an undefeated Big 12 team rematches with a 2 or 3 loss team in the proposed conference championship game and loses? Then will the pundits blame the conference for having a championship game?
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
ESPN dude just said this was an error and isn't happening

His source? Common sense.

You don't invite anyone that drops per team payout, and you certainly don't invite Memphis and Cincinnati as a response to the committee needing to paint a target around their arrow or how much you like the road trip to a nice street in an otherwise **** hole city like Memphis.
 

CycloneBob

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2010
848
343
63
Ames
On Big12 expansion - I say bring it on. I don't care if it is Cincy and Memphis. Are they great adds? Probably not. But as an ISU fan, what do I care? The money might be a little diluted? Well, all this Big12 10-team-league largesse hasn't done us jack squat of good so far for the Clones. So $20M instead of $22M is not a big deal to me.

Playing an 8 game schedule again (assuming 5+3 like old Big12), playing two non-powerhouse teams more often, avoiding TX and OU more often, getting 4 non-con games. That means more wins. I think that 2-3 more wins per year (and an additional home game) might raise revenue more for ISU than being in a stud league and winning 3 games a year. We will still get strong teams to play, and (god forbid) we get into a conf champ game, we will get our shot at OU or TX or whoever.

And I know some will argue about the 8 game vs 9 game conf schedule and TV inventory. But 6 games per week times 8 weeks is 48; 5 per week times 9 weeks is 45. So it's actually MORE games for TV. Am I wrong about that?


I wouldn't add BYU just because wrong direction from WVU. But UCF, USF, Tulane, even Pitt (or anyone from the ACC if you could get them). No problem. Pick the best available east of the Mississipi and let's go.

Well said!
 

MyCyView

Active Member
Sep 3, 2014
103
146
43
Add 4 - BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, Cincinnati..

East Division - ISU, WV, Cinn, KSU, KU,Texas, Baylor

West Division - BYU, Boise St, Col St, OU, OSU, TT, TCU
 

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,508
651
113
46
hiawatha, ia
Add 4 - BYU, Colorado State, Boise State, Cincinnati..

East Division - ISU, WV, Cinn, KSU, KU,Texas, Baylor

West Division - BYU, Boise St, Col St, OU, OSU, TT, TCU

That would really dilute the $. They will add only 2 unless someone like Notre Dame came on board.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,800
14,754
113
Iowa
That would really dilute the $. They will add only 2 unless someone like Notre Dame came on board.


BYU has a national following which would help. Colorado State gets the Big 12 the Denver market back. That's over 3 million more eyeballs. Cincinnati is in a multi million person market. Boise State is the one I don't think would help at all.



If we had to add two, right now I want Cincinnati and Memphis

If we have to add four, give me Cincy, Memphis, and Uconn. We've already established geography no longer matters.
 

CyBroncos

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2010
4,083
71
48
West Des Moines
BYU has a national following which would help. Colorado State gets the Big 12 the Denver market back. That's over 3 million more eyeballs. Cincinnati is in a multi million person market. Boise State is the one I don't think would help at all.



If we had to add two, right now I want Cincinnati and Memphis

If we have to add four, give me Cincy, Memphis, and Uconn. We've already established geography no longer matters.

Denver is a pro sports town - mostly Broncos. They hardly pay attention to Colorado and CSU is even lower on the total pole. The only way I see taking CSU is a bridge to BYU but that's a big reach
 

erikbj

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2006
7,508
651
113
46
hiawatha, ia
BYU has a national following which would help. Colorado State gets the Big 12 the Denver market back. That's over 3 million more eyeballs. Cincinnati is in a multi million person market. Boise State is the one I don't think would help at all.



If we had to add two, right now I want Cincinnati and Memphis

If we have to add four, give me Cincy, Memphis, and Uconn. We've already established geography no longer matters.

I just don't see our tv deal increasing by $80MM / year because of those 4 teams. I think by going west is not a good long term solution, more traveling and now you are covering 3 time zones. Flying cross country mid week is not what these student athletes need, this is not the NBA.

Need to prevent this from being a knee jerk reaction to the final 4 teams. Even if TCU and Baylor played in a conference champ game, there is still a good chance the committee would have taken OSU, because of the name on the helmet.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,800
14,754
113
Iowa
Denver is a pro sports town - mostly Broncos. They hardly pay attention to Colorado and CSU is even lower on the total pole. The only way I see taking CSU is a bridge to BYU but that's a big reach

Good points.

Maybe I'm just partial to Colorado and want an excuse to visit :)
 

dunar

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2007
2,359
580
113
West Des Moines, IA
I don't think TV markets matter as much as good matchups. The BTN model needs new markets to get on to basic or lower cable tiers, getting the per subscriber $. Big 12 is with ESPN and Fox, both are already on most basic tiers (not all the FSNs, but the OTAs and basic cable ESPNU/FS1), where a good matchup brings the eyeballs/advertiser money.
 

everyyard

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 24, 2006
8,216
3,637
113
48
www.cyclonejerseys.com
If we're going for a project I say let's see what Ohio U can turn into with big xII money for a few years. Gets us in B1G land and good Ohio recruiting. Expands our TV footprint. Gives us a travel partner for WV. A team that ISU should be competitive to. Avoids stigma of commuter schools and directional schools.
 

berther48

Active Member
Jul 10, 2009
476
36
28
76
Sioux City, Iowa
http://www.espn929.com/pages/20457311.php

According to a radio host in Nashville, the Big 12 is going to add two teams in the offseason: Cincinnati and Memphis. The theory is that the Big 12 will be penalized most years by not having a conference championship game by the playoff committee.

I would prefer NIU over Memphis, its 60 minutes from Chicago, it would bring a better TV viewing area than Memphis, along with Cincinnati brings in Ohio area. College population size are shown below
Cincinati 40000..... / TTU .......35000 / Ames......33000/ WVU.....29000 so the size is comparable.
NIU .....15814 / Baylor ....13292 / TCU .....9725 , NIU is larger than Baylor and TCU. So these two schools would be a proper fit academically and athletically in our conference. Both school between ISU and WVU could help develop a Northern division along with Kansas and K-state. It would help us recruit in the Chicago and Ohio areas.
Just my take on it.
Go Cyclones.