Isn't that just their efficiency matrix adjust for ncsos?Kenpom has them rated at 285 as of this morning.
Pac12 - AZOkay non ISU post, how many top 4 seeds will each conference get?
Big 12 4
SEC 4
Big East 3 (their only bids?)
Big 10 3
ACC 2
I feel like I am missing someone
"Non-con strength of schedule rating." is how it is listed. But I don't know. You'd think they would track with each other...Isn't that just their efficiency matrix adjust for ncsos?
The non-conference stuff is blown out of proportion. Sometimes you think you schedule well and then once the season actually plays out some teams aren't good.
Take Oklahoma for example, in November it looks like they had scheduled extremely difficult. Iowa and Providence have come off multiple NCAA tournaments in row. Arkansas was projected to compete with Tennessee for the SEC title, and USC was suppose to be a contender in the Pac-12.
All of those teams ended up being pretty bad except for North Carolina.
I haven’t really heard anyone talking about this, but seeing it earlier made me 100% of the opinion we deserve the 1. Media types like Clark may not know it (because no other media person has pointed it out), but the committee will most certainly be aware.Clark Kellogg should be forced to acknowledge that the #1 overall seed he agrees with has a Non-con SOS of 285
Honestly he is so analytical it confuses me lol, it would be an outlier to other ncsos ratings if it were that low as a true rating."Non-con strength of schedule rating." is how it is listed. But I don't know.
it is permissable to have Iowa State and Houston meet in the elite 8 or regional finals.
Clemson needs to STFU unless they are willing to schedule a home and home.Overall strength of SOS, includes non con and conference. It's why I have no idea what TJ should do going forward, we ended up 16-36 overall SOS depending on where you look. They seriously want ISU to schedule super tough in the non con and be in the top 3 SOS every year? I get that 325 is too high for non con but is 100-200 good enough? Those are the questions I want to know going forward
He's such an arrogant pile of crapClark Kellogg seems irrationally angry that ISU might get a 1
Exactly, then remember last year when in November we played 2 blue bloods in UNC and Villanova, then by the end of year they didn't even make the tournament.Yep. When you consider that most teams are going to schedule like 5 real noncon games, we had 4 P6 games in our mix of those- TAMU, Va Tech, Iowa, and the big east challenge. We just had the bad luck that they all performed less than expectation and the conference assigned us a terrible big east game. That had nothing to do with 'choosing' to schedule poorly, as Kellogg asserted
It's a huge analytical operation over there. Could it be a mistake? Misplace a decimal point here or there...Honestly he is so analytical it confuses me lol, it would be an outlier to other ncsos ratings if it were that low as a true rating.
That was so 12 hours agoJust broke both ankles running to the CF forums after seeing JERRY PALM has us as a #1 SEED!?!?!?