The officiating can not favor one side or the other and still totally suck. This is what's wrong with ref apologists, they think keeping the fouls evened up is the refs doing their job properly.
Have you looked at the stats of West Virginia's opponents? http://statsheet.com/mcb/teams/west-virginia/game_stats Only three of them committed LESS than 20 fouls in their games against WVU. Drawing fouls is a skill that is taught by Huggins. The relentless pressure applied by WVU results in putting opponents into positions where they are chasing, trying to recover and scrambling, which leads to a dramatic increase in fouls called against them. It wasn't bad reffing. It was uncharacteristic play, which is what WVU's style forces you into. ISU has good enough players off the bench and shot well enough that they were able to still win despite the foul trouble they were forced into. I would think that ISU fans, fans of a team that typically IS the more aggressive team that forces opponents into fouling a bunch, would understand this. What happened to you is what you normally do to other teams.Well when you lead the nation in least number of fouls called and then have that garbage happen. It's going to come up in discussion.
This is printed after almost every game that ISU plays and definitely after every game ISU plays against an aggressive defense. I only saw the second half once I got home from Lawrence. Once I saw that Georges, Hogue and Morris all had four fouls the first thing that went through my head was "If ISU loses this game their fans are going to freak out about the refs". It's a pretty consistent thing.
Ugh. At some point you'll learn that different play styles result in different foul counts. And ISU leads the Big 12 in foul disparity by the way.This is rich coming from the fan of a school which is typically highly favored by the refs.
ThisI guess I've always been a bit amazed how declaring yourself a physical team somehow allows you to get away with fouls.
I assume that WVU fans are griping about the refs just like people here are. They probably have a long list of missed calls just like every fan base of every team that ever plays a tight game.Saw this on Twitter this morning and laughed: @CMAnderson247: Bob Huggins alluding to missed calls by refs, says Devin Williams kept getting his goggles knocked off. "I don’t think he hit himself."
Have you looked at the stats of West Virginia's opponents? http://statsheet.com/mcb/teams/west-virginia/game_stats Only three of them committed LESS than 20 fouls in their games against WVU. Drawing fouls is a skill that is taught by Huggins. The relentless pressure applied by WVU results in putting opponents into positions where they are chasing, trying to recover and scrambling, which leads to a dramatic increase in fouls called against them. It wasn't bad reffing. It was uncharacteristic play, which is what WVU's style forces you into. ISU has good enough players off the bench and shot well enough that they were able to still win despite the foul trouble they were forced into. I would think that ISU fans, fans of a team that typically IS the more aggressive team that forces opponents into fouling a bunch, would understand this. What happened to you is what you normally do to other teams.
This ISU team "doesn't foul a lot" because they played a half dozen games against terrible teams so they didn't face any pressure to foul. Coincidence that the games where ISU has committed the most fouls were @WVU, vs. South Carolina, vs. Maryland and vs. Arkansas?!? It's not me that's having a hard time understanding this. Fans HATE watching their teams play against teams like WVU. I can guarantee that every opponent of WVU this year will have people griping about all the fouls called against them and all the fouls that WVU got away with. Same with South Carolina and Arkansas. Face it, fans are overly sensitive and like to gripe about the refs. It's practically it's own hobby these days.Comparing what other teams have done against WVU in terms of fouls is not a good indicator of what did/should happen against ISU. This ISU team just does not foul a lot. ISU did do some fouling, there is no question about that. The issue ISU fans have is that WVU was pushing, shoving, and grabbing all the way down court on the press and under the basket without being called for it. Add to that some absolute phantom fouls that Staten got, and fans get upset. I think the biggest factor in this is that Huggins is a master at working the officials, while Fred is more concerned about coaching during the game. I wouldn't expect a KU fan to understand, as we have seen first hand how the officials work for KU for years.
Just call it like I see it in the 1-2 game a year where the officiating clearly decides the game (or makes it close like tonight). Maryland and South Carolina roughed us up too...but the officiating had nothing to do with those losses.
Had we lost tonight would anyone really have remotely thought WVU looked like the better team? 5 on 8 out there, huge win given that hurdle to clear.
Lowly Texas Tech was in the double bonus with 9 minutes left in the first half yesterday. 26 fouls called against the two teams in the first half. Ridiculous, unwatchable basketball. If they want to know how to increase scoring in college basketball they should stop calling all the pointless ticky tack fouls which do nothing but reset the shot clock and let a team burn more time standing around waiting for the next whistle. The refs are out of control with their whistles these first few games of Big 12 play. CLEARLY there has been some type of communication sent down to the Big 12 refs to call everything even remotely resembling a foul. Driving home from the KU game I was listening to the Texas game and then the OU game and they both were having the same problem. TOO MUCH.
Was Limpy the guy with Hok vanity plates?
I remember at least a half dozen moving screens by ISU last night that didn't get called and I only saw some of the second half. It is probably the least made call in college basketball. Come to think of it, I don't even remember the last time I saw a moving screen called in any college game I have watched.other than the fact that Maryland got away with about 143 moving picks. A lot of them resulting in open three looks.