All Iowa/Iowa State team

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,789
113
Ankeny
You can't really do worse than laying an egg in a bowl game like Beathard always does. I said before Beathard is probably better than Lanning but not by much
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
23,560
25,913
113
Behind you
Deeper backfield? Warren is a better RB than Iowa has had since Wadley has been in Iowa City. Warren gets a lot of carries and yes he has fumbled in two critcal moments. One was a great fumble, the other sucked.

Beathard sucks in bowl games, should I use that as an argument that Lanning is better?

Warren starts, when it's the final drive with a minute less, Daniels is in.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: cyIclSoneU

theiacowtipper

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2010
901
493
63
57
Deeper backfield? Warren is a better RB than Iowa has had since Wadley has been in Iowa City. Warren gets a lot of carries and yes he has fumbled in two critcal moments. One was a great fumble, the other sucked.

Beathard sucks in bowl games, should I use that as an argument that Lanning is better?

I don't think a single Iowa poster has honestly said its not Warren first. Only that the gap isn't huge.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,789
113
Ankeny
I don't think a single Iowa poster has honestly said its not Warren first. Only that the gap isn't huge.

Besides the one that said Iowa's back up RB is more talented than Warren and the others saying it's debatable. I genuinely didn't know Hawkeye fans thought he was good considering he didn't play much last year. Lots of Kool Aid being drank after beating a bottom feeder MAC team apparently
 

Hawkmi1987

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2016
1,706
2,329
113
36
Newton, Ia
Besides the one that said Iowa's back up RB is more talented than Warren and the others saying it's debatable. I genuinely didn't know Hawkeye fans thought he was good considering he didn't play much last year. Lots of Kool Aid being drank after beating a bottom feeder MAC team apparently
Whatever fits your narrative. Simply saying I don't think the talent gap is as massive as you are suggesting, but that's pretty much par for the course for you.
 

CarlHungus

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2012
8,511
2,861
113
Ankeny
I thought I heard Iowa is starting a freshman center, is that true? If so, I would guess Bobek would probably start at center for them
 

AltHawk

Active Member
Sep 2, 2012
614
296
28
And 984 rushing yards is quite a bit less than what Mike Warren did with a worse OL.

I can literally give you 100 examples why Mike Warren is the best RB in the state. Stats, accolades, etc will back that up. Please give me one reason or example to explain why someone would say Iowa's back up RB is better than a highly regarded RB like Warren

Because if you watch the two play it's clear to anyone
Deeper backfield? Warren is a better RB than Iowa has had since Wadley has been in Iowa City. Warren gets a lot of carries and yes he has fumbled in two critcal moments. One was a great fumble, the other sucked.

Beathard sucks in bowl games, should I use that as an argument that Lanning is better?

All you have to do is watch both of them play and judge them off talent as opposed to stats (I know you don't know a whole lot about football and always revert to citing statistics). Wadley has elite elusiveness and short-area burst, is turning into a dangerous receiver out of the backfield, and has very good vision. The only area he struggles in is pass protection, which is to be expected for a smaller back.

Warren doesn't have any elite traits. He's a very good running back, but does not have the dynamic explosiveness that Wadley does.
 

Hawkmi1987

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2016
1,706
2,329
113
36
Newton, Ia
I thought I heard Iowa is starting a freshman center, is that true? If so, I would guess Bobek would probably start at center for them
James Daniels is a True Soph. He will be playing on Sundays in 3 years. He is the first center that I can remember pulling on sweeps and counters. Very impressive athlete.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The_Gent

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,789
113
Ankeny
Because if you watch the two play it's clear to anyone


All you have to do is watch both of them play and judge them off talent as opposed to stats (I know you don't know a whole lot about football and always revert to citing statistics). Wadley has elite elusiveness and short-area burst, is turning into a dangerous receiver out of the backfield, and has very good vision. The only area he struggles in is pass protection, which is to be expected for a smaller back.

Warren doesn't have any elite traits. He's a very good running back, but does not have the dynamic explosiveness that Wadley does.

Ok I'm getting trolled. Well done
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
23,560
25,913
113
Behind you
Because if you watch the two play it's clear to anyone


All you have to do is watch both of them play and judge them off talent as opposed to stats (I know you don't know a whole lot about football and always revert to citing statistics). Wadley has elite elusiveness and short-area burst, is turning into a dangerous receiver out of the backfield, and has very good vision. The only area he struggles in is pass protection, which is to be expected for a smaller back.

Warren doesn't have any elite traits. He's a very good running back, but does not have the dynamic explosiveness that Wadley does.

Warren's also racking up stats against pretty atrocious rush D's.
 

GTO

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2014
28,092
36,938
113
North DFW, TX
Park >>>>>>>> Lanning >>>>>>>> Noland (while injured) >>>>>>> Wiegers >>>>>>> Rudock (;)) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Beathard
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron