***2024 NCAA Wrestling - Session 1 (Thurs., 11:00)***
- Thread starter theshadow
- Start date
And that wraps up Session 1.
Still waiting for the team point deduction to be recorded...
Still waiting for the team point deduction to be recorded...
| PTS | CH | CO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penn State | 15.5 | 8 | 2 |
| 2 | Nebraska | 14.0 | 8 | 1 |
| 3 | Michigan | 13.5 | 8 | 1 |
| 4 | Ohio State | 12.5 | 7 | 2 |
| 5 | Iowa State | 13.0 (but really 12.0) | 6 | 3 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 11.5 | 7 | 3 |
| 7 | Cornell | 11.0 | 7 | 2 |
| 7 | NC State | 11.0 | 6 | 4 |
| 9 | Iowa | 10.5 | 6 | 3 |
| 10 | Oklahoma State | 10.0 | 7 | 3 |
So MJ owes the team a pin.
6-3 with 3 bonus point wins.
Hope the young guys have the jitters out and come out firing in the the night session.
Many winnable matches to start the night (Will being the outlier, he could catch Keck, but seems very unlikely).
Hope the young guys have the jitters out and come out firing in the the night session.
Many winnable matches to start the night (Will being the outlier, he could catch Keck, but seems very unlikely).
Four bonus: Ech, Carr, Feldman, Bastida. That's some teamwork!
MJ got an unsportsmanlike as his match concluded.
Shoved the Army guy, no clue if he said something.
Why don't they deduct it right away? And we're sure it wasn't just a warning?
There's no warning for unsportsmanlike conduct.
It happened after time expired, so it's an automatic team point. Maybe the mat table didn't notify the head table.
I scored the brackets to seed, then the number of points for each round expected based on that seed. I included the top 10 based on those seeds (leaving out Penn State because they just annoy me). Based on the first round expectations on seeds for each wrestler, here is the variance per weight and also a team variance. Obviously Feldcamp and Bastida were huge contributors in this round. (note: Michigan and Ohio State were not included based on criteria above) Here are variances to seeds for round 1.
John Smith will make sure the head table finds out about it.
If @theshadow says it’s a team point, you can take it to the bank.
Is this saying we scored 6 points over our projected seed based point total as a team?
Of note, if anyone paid attention to the original scores to seed, Nebraska had 58 points in that analysis, but it was flawed, they only should have had 48.
