A familiar team at #3...
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2878950-5-biggest-mens-ncaa-tournament-no-1-seed-snubs
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2878950-5-biggest-mens-ncaa-tournament-no-1-seed-snubs
The loss to Drake haunted that team. They would have been a 1 seed and national champion if that doesn't happen.
Does anyone know any of the history behind the tourney committee in 2000? Was there any built in bias that would have favored Stanford? Or was this just an honest blunder? I don't recall the nature of that discussion post-seeding.
Yeah, the combination of Morgan's recruiting and Larry's coaching would have been great, it seems. Morgan was only on staff for Larry's last season, correct? And that was long enough to land a couple of great players.Loved Larry. Never should have been canned. He would have won the conference title again if he got to coach Stinson/Blalock. IMO.