A familiar team at #3...
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2878950-5-biggest-mens-ncaa-tournament-no-1-seed-snubs
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2878950-5-biggest-mens-ncaa-tournament-no-1-seed-snubs
Biggest Men's NCAA Tournament No. 1 Seed Snubs
- Thread starter psychlone99
- Start date
Does anyone know any of the history behind the tourney committee in 2000? Was there any built in bias that would have favored Stanford? Or was this just an honest blunder? I don't recall the nature of that discussion post-seeding.
The full game at KU that year is on Youtube in 4 segments. They were down by about 10 with 4-5 minutes left.
It's known for Fizer's clinching shot but Tinsley with 2 pick pockets and going full length for scores showcased the perfect mixture of talent and toughness that imo hasn't been replicated since.
Many didn't like LE's style of ball but there wasn't much to not like about watching that team.
It's known for Fizer's clinching shot but Tinsley with 2 pick pockets and going full length for scores showcased the perfect mixture of talent and toughness that imo hasn't been replicated since.
Many didn't like LE's style of ball but there wasn't much to not like about watching that team.
Yeah, the combination of Morgan's recruiting and Larry's coaching would have been great, it seems. Morgan was only on staff for Larry's last season, correct? And that was long enough to land a couple of great players.
Not only were we not a 1 seed, we must have been the lowest 2 seed, correct? Doesn't the lowest 2 seed get put with the number one overall seed (MSU)? Or is it strictly by location at that point
