Los Alamos also denied ever having known or heard of him, saying he didn't ever work there. Then a phone registry of employees turned up with his name listed. And an article from the early 80s in the Los Alamos newspaper profiled Lazar and mentioned his employment as a physicist at the lab.
Listened to the Rogan podcast and he seemed very credible. Then you read a bit and it seems to fall apart. I haven't spent much time researching this, but this is a pretty good writeup that debunks Lazar pretty well: http://www.otherhand.org/home-page/...bob-lazar-story-from-the-perspective-of-2018/
I do believe in alien life, alien intelligence, and even the possibility of them visiting earth. Like I said, I WANT to believe him. But if I'm being honest with myself some very basic details of his story do not add up. The fact that were not one but 9 alien aircraft, and they were ALL different. That has some very eyebrow raising implications. The fact that they were so focused on keeping individual programs isolated from each other, but they had all the ships in one location and all the hangar doors open so he could see all of them. The fact that despite how tight security was and how little information they gave him he was able to get a flight test schedule?! And there were plenty more questions I had listening to his claims. I actually started out believing him, but by the end there was too much that did not pass the smell test for me. I think he is an intelligent guy with decades to formulate a convincing story, but he is nothing more than a good conman.
I was a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford but unfortunately the government wants me to be a CPA so they have "gotten rid of" all those records
Got maybe 5 minutes into it last night, but the 3 year old refused to go to sleep so had to postpone the rest.
Initial reaction: it'd be nice if they skipped all the weird ass theatrics at the beginning. All that just makes the wife more skeptical in my doc choice for the evening, get to the point!
Regarding Lazar, I feel like this doesn't make any sense. And to think the schools erased his history without pressure from any organization makes even less sense. Brilliant people go crazy all the time, their schools don't erase their history.Here's my opinion on the guy and mystery surrounding him:
The guy is very intelligent and did go to these various universities and worked at Los Alamos, etc. He likely worked on secret government research for what is actually at Area 51 - high tech and experimental military aircraft, missiles, etc. At some point, he started believing crazy conspiracies about aliens. This could easily happen, even to an intelligent person. Maybe he had a really bad year (think divorce, deaths in the family, etc) and lost it for a while. Then, he started filtering all of his world through the lens that aliens are real and there is some kind of secret shadow government, etc. Eventually, he starts going public with his ideas, which causes MIT, CalTech, Los Alamos, etc to disown him. These kinds of organizations do not want to be associated with alien conspiracy theorists. They all now deny any association to him because they do not want to lend any credence to his theories.
I also think people need to remember that there is a significant difference between aliens and UFOs. Aliens have not been seen or reported by any credible witnesses. UFOs have been seen by credible witnesses. There are a lot of things out there which have no relation to aliens at all that we don't understand about the universe. Many UFOs were secret government research planes seen by random people, many more are just people seeing things they can't understand and attributing it to aliens. The human mind is a strange thing. Our brains are so programmed to recognize certain patterns that we see them even when they aren't there. For example, people often look at a random pile of sticks and leaves and see a human face.
It's boring, but that's reality.
Just remember billions of planets and solar systems exist. In 1988/89 I don't believe that was anywhere close to mainstream thinking or belief. Think about that now and that seems totally dumb/ignorant we didn't already believe that.
.
The doc was made by a douchebag hipster and, even though I love Mickey Rourke, he was an odd choice for narrator.Totally agree it made me roll my eyes, especially with Mickey Rourke narrating. That's why I enjoyed the interview with Rogan a lot more than the doc.
Incompetent? It is often (at least historically) filled with the the best people who often do something because they love it not for the money (though competitive pay is important). Typically people mean bureaucratic machinery makes no sense at a lot of levels even though it may have a goal. It makes no sense not because it is incompetent but hasn't evolved yet to solve a problem.The government IS very incompetent.
No, incompetent is the correct word. We have far too many people that are homeless and the government does nothing about it. That is one of hundreds of examples I could give.Incompetent? It is often (at least historically) filled with the the best people who often do something because they love it not for the money (though competitive pay is important). Typically people mean bureaucratic machinery makes no sense at a lot of levels even though it may have a goal. It makes no sense not because it is incompetent but hasn't evolved yet to solve a problem.
NASA!? for starters was for all of us and took us to the Moon. When there was a problem the Gov. experts were the top of the line on-call to fix a problem. You now live in a world were Gov. has been denigrated, taken apart and we are instilled with disinformation. Too bad you live in this modern world were Gov. is the now considered "the problem" as a addled old Prez. once said. Good luck to you to rely on nice monopolies and billionaire sociopaths who only have your best interest at heart.
Ole Barry, if he’s still alive, needs to come forward to corroborate the story.