Sam Adams/Dogfish merger
- Thread starter JP4CY
- Start date
I’m ok with this. Better than than being bought by A/B. Plus I rarely drink anything from Dogfish and never from Sam Adams.
Samuel Jackson would never let this happen with his brewery.
A/B isn't buying anyone out - they were bought out themselves by InBev like a decade ago now.
Sure. How much stock of the old Dogfish Head for normal shareholders get converted into the stock of the new company? None. That's not a merger.
I’m not talking about the business side, I’m referring to the philosophy of the business between the 2 owners.
They can call it whatever they want - it’s still InBev, not AB. It was InBev that bought out AB, not AB that bought out InBev. How do I know? Before the merger I was a shareholder in AB. After the merger, I was told “you’re not a shareholder anymore. Have this check.”
Yes, we’re all aware about InBev. Something you may not know, people still refer them as anheuser busch or Budweiser.
People are idiots. Ask any Cyclone fan that watches either a game or highlights and has to continuously endure being called the Hawkeyes.
They can call it whatever they want, yes. Which is why he isn’t wrong when he called it AB because they still use that.
