To those posters who don't think there's an issue with this course imagine if the NCAA just arbitrarily moved the 3 point line back 5 feet for NCAA tournament games, or narrowed or lengthened the court. All of the players would be playing on the same court...but is it fair to them?
Staying tune to see if Koepka wins and ******* about how unfair the course was to his competitors.
Two pins got away. You want to know the problem? The problem is that the PGA Tour coddles these guys and sets up everything so that they are never uncomfortable. They never play in any sort of foul weather. Everything is set up to get them to 10 under par or so. SO when they get something that makes them uncomfortable, it feels unfair. The pins on 13 and 15 were bad. I'm not saying they weren't. They were not impossible, though. If these guys don't want to see a ball roll back and want to continue to take advantage of technology and advancement on the performance side, this stuff is going to happen. It's the only way these courses won't be made a mockery of.
After today's round, Patrick Reed called the 3rd-round setup "fair" with the exception of two pin placements. But what would he know?
That he’s a douscheAfter today's round, Patrick Reed called the 3rd-round setup "fair" with the exception of two pin placements. But what would he know?
To those posters who don't think there's an issue with this course imagine if the NCAA just arbitrarily moved the 3 point line back 5 feet for NCAA tournament games, or narrowed or lengthened the court. All of the players would be playing on the same court...but is it fair to them?
Another US Open. Another round of the same babies whining about the course setup. No one is forcing anyone to play in this.
The US Open is not just a test of clubs and shafts and balls. It’s about CAJONES. JUEVOS. CRAN.
Why do we care what they are to par? They are so good that I want to see good shots. And when they get on the green, I don’t need to see them putting it off the green. That’s not how golf was meant to played and it still isn’t. The course was built 100 years ago. This wasn’t the intended setup. I don’t see why it needs to change. They’ve lengthened it plenty.
Everyone seems to hate Patrick Reed, but I love the guy.
I couldn't give a **** less what they are to par. I thought Erin Hills was fantastic but it was done in by weather. I thought this week was very interesting. 2 out of 72 holes got away from them, players bitched like a bunch of entitled children, and they were forced to back it way off. People hit ****** golf shots yesterday. There was zero wrong with how receptive those greens were. They're also Poa greens and if you expect smooth Poa at a US Open, or anywhere for that matter, that's your own fault. Talking heads are putting this in the 04 and 14 category. That's preposterous.
These guys live on the PGA Tour where they actively avoid any sort of weather, they soften everything so if there are missed they are never exacerbated. The rough is grown up around the green so everything stays close. Once they have to struggle they go into orbit.
Then people ***** when the USGA just goes with it. If people are just going to ***** about everything, and right now it seems like people are doing to be a part of the cool kids group, they are constantly going to be going back and forth. People should have been defending them after last year when the weather dictated Erin Hills wasn't going to be what it was expected to be. Instead, they bitched. They bitched yesterday and they're ******** today.