NBA: *** 2024 NBA thread ***

cedarstrip

Well-Known Member
Aug 26, 2013
631
632
93
My rabbit hole of going back to 90's I found the rule of getting 3 free throws on a fouled 3 point attempt only goes back to 95. I know that's 30 years but how was that not a given once the 3 pointer was a thing.
Hopefully someone can find a clip. I remember an interview with Johnny when they were looking at going to 3 free throws on 3 point shots and they asked Johnny what he thought about it, it was over 30 years ago but I think Johnny said "it's the dumbest $#@&$ thing I've ever heard of"

I miss Johnny.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NWICY

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,119
2,730
113
Atkins
Kind of surprising, but if I were a Knicks fan I think I'd be supportive of the change. I can't help but think that if Carlisle and Thibs swapped benches, the outcome might have swapped, too. The play style of putting so much reliance on heavy minutes from the starters and offensive workload on Brunson just doesn't pay off in the modern NBA. In the playoffs, a coach has to be able to make a ton of adjustments and maximize the value of his role players, and Thibs has just shown little ability to do that.

The Knicks did make it further than they did last year, which they should be happy about. But they also got knocked out by the same team, despite the Knicks probably improving more on paper from last playoffs than the Pacers did (full health in the series, and adding KAT vs. Randle being completely out last year). The Knicks aren't constructed very well, but I think many coaches would've handled their roster better than Thibs did.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,658
24,693
113
Kind of surprising, but if I were a Knicks fan I think I'd be supportive of the change. I can't help but think that if Carlisle and Thibs swapped benches, the outcome might have swapped, too. The play style of putting so much reliance on heavy minutes from the starters and offensive workload on Brunson just doesn't pay off in the modern NBA. In the playoffs, a coach has to be able to make a ton of adjustments and maximize the value of his role players, and Thibs has just shown little ability to do that.

The Knicks did make it further than they did last year, which they should be happy about. But they also got knocked out by the same team, despite the Knicks probably improving more on paper from last playoffs than the Pacers did (full health in the series, and adding KAT vs. Randle being completely out last year). The Knicks aren't constructed very well, but I think many coaches would've handled their roster better than Thibs did.

Other coaches wouldn’t have waited until the playoffs to see that 7th or 8th guy could contribute some minutes.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,385
65,589
113
LA LA Land
If he couldnt get KAT and Brunson to play D, I dont know who will.

Exactly, Thibs signature short rotation is only a part of what kept them from title contention.

Two ball dominant excellent half court offensive players who are poor in transition and defense for their position.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JP4CY

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,385
65,589
113
LA LA Land
Other coaches wouldn’t have waited until the playoffs to see that 7th or 8th guy could contribute some minutes.

His teams are regular season beasts with post season limits for this, all the way back to DRose teams.

That said on offense it doesn’t matter what the rotation is if the team stars don’t share the ball.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,385
65,589
113
LA LA Land
Kind of surprising, but if I were a Knicks fan I think I'd be supportive of the change. I can't help but think that if Carlisle and Thibs swapped benches, the outcome might have swapped, too. The play style of putting so much reliance on heavy minutes from the starters and offensive workload on Brunson just doesn't pay off in the modern NBA. In the playoffs, a coach has to be able to make a ton of adjustments and maximize the value of his role players, and Thibs has just shown little ability to do that.

The Knicks did make it further than they did last year, which they should be happy about. But they also got knocked out by the same team, despite the Knicks probably improving more on paper from last playoffs than the Pacers did (full health in the series, and adding KAT vs. Randle being completely out last year). The Knicks aren't constructed very well, but I think many coaches would've handled their roster better than Thibs did.

I was going to say something g similar. The Pacers had significant injuries last year too (and first half of this year or they’d have finished easily ahead of NY), there was just a media ban on discussing it and part of why they got slept on this year. Against Boston least year Tyrese was basically a decoy who couldn’t even shoot, healthy Indy could’ve made finals or had a 6-7 game ECF, all the games were close even though they got swept.
 

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,119
2,730
113
Atkins
Other coaches wouldn’t have waited until the playoffs to see that 7th or 8th guy could contribute some minutes.
That, too. Knicks fans talk about having no depth, but part of the way you get depth is by trying out different lineups during the regular season to see what works and in what situations players play best.

I have a hard time believing that Ben Sheppard and Thomas Bryant/Tony Bradley are enough better than Landry Shamet and Precious Achiuwa for the former to be getting important minutes while the latter are bench afterthoughts.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,385
65,589
113
LA LA Land
That, too. Knicks fans talk about having no depth, but part of the way you get depth is by trying out different lineups during the regular season to see what works and in what situations players play best.

I have a hard time believing that Ben Sheppard and Thomas Bryant/Tony Bradley are enough better than Landry Shamet and Precious Achiuwa for the former to be getting important minutes while the latter are bench afterthoughts.

Exactly this, Ben Sheppard as an example is a decent player who has 100% bought in to his role which makes him more valuable to the Pacers than he might be on paper in a trade.

It helps having a uniquely unselfish star player like Tyrese who doesn't get upset when Carlisle subs him out on key defensive playoff possessions for a role player like Sheppard. Tyrese knows Carlisle will do the same on offense to make sure he closes every quarter final shot in a key game.

Brunson sucks on D and doesn't even have Tyrese length to disrupt plays, a lot of those players on the bench would have been way better in key defensive situations. Carlisle/Tyrese/role players all believe in that without egos, Thibs/Brunson/cast just don't do that or have that trust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJ271

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron