If he couldnt get KAT and Brunson to play D, I dont know who will.Shocking. Also not shocking. The knicks are the cowboys of basketball.
Perhaps those 2 are overrated and the knocks need to start over.If he couldnt get KAT and Brunson to play D, I dont know who will.
Hot-take: that organization goes backwards next season! Unless they pull off something crazy like acquiring Giannis. And even then...it isn't easy to make the conference finals!Thibs fired?
Hopefully someone can find a clip. I remember an interview with Johnny when they were looking at going to 3 free throws on 3 point shots and they asked Johnny what he thought about it, it was over 30 years ago but I think Johnny said "it's the dumbest $#@&$ thing I've ever heard of"My rabbit hole of going back to 90's I found the rule of getting 3 free throws on a fouled 3 point attempt only goes back to 95. I know that's 30 years but how was that not a given once the 3 pointer was a thing.
If he couldnt get KAT and Brunson to play D, I dont know who will.
Kind of surprising, but if I were a Knicks fan I think I'd be supportive of the change. I can't help but think that if Carlisle and Thibs swapped benches, the outcome might have swapped, too. The play style of putting so much reliance on heavy minutes from the starters and offensive workload on Brunson just doesn't pay off in the modern NBA. In the playoffs, a coach has to be able to make a ton of adjustments and maximize the value of his role players, and Thibs has just shown little ability to do that.
The Knicks did make it further than they did last year, which they should be happy about. But they also got knocked out by the same team, despite the Knicks probably improving more on paper from last playoffs than the Pacers did (full health in the series, and adding KAT vs. Randle being completely out last year). The Knicks aren't constructed very well, but I think many coaches would've handled their roster better than Thibs did.
If he couldnt get KAT and Brunson to play D, I dont know who will.
Other coaches wouldn’t have waited until the playoffs to see that 7th or 8th guy could contribute some minutes.
Kind of surprising, but if I were a Knicks fan I think I'd be supportive of the change. I can't help but think that if Carlisle and Thibs swapped benches, the outcome might have swapped, too. The play style of putting so much reliance on heavy minutes from the starters and offensive workload on Brunson just doesn't pay off in the modern NBA. In the playoffs, a coach has to be able to make a ton of adjustments and maximize the value of his role players, and Thibs has just shown little ability to do that.
The Knicks did make it further than they did last year, which they should be happy about. But they also got knocked out by the same team, despite the Knicks probably improving more on paper from last playoffs than the Pacers did (full health in the series, and adding KAT vs. Randle being completely out last year). The Knicks aren't constructed very well, but I think many coaches would've handled their roster better than Thibs did.
That, too. Knicks fans talk about having no depth, but part of the way you get depth is by trying out different lineups during the regular season to see what works and in what situations players play best.Other coaches wouldn’t have waited until the playoffs to see that 7th or 8th guy could contribute some minutes.
That, too. Knicks fans talk about having no depth, but part of the way you get depth is by trying out different lineups during the regular season to see what works and in what situations players play best.
I have a hard time believing that Ben Sheppard and Thomas Bryant/Tony Bradley are enough better than Landry Shamet and Precious Achiuwa for the former to be getting important minutes while the latter are bench afterthoughts.
I feel kind of bad Hali got Thibs fired from the Knicks.
Heard on radio hes owed $30 million.