Principal Financial-Remote work

qwerty

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 3, 2020
7,677
11,616
113
60
Muscatine, IA
Well the good news is that Beaverdale to downtown commute is pretty sweet.

My company is still holding true to remote work. Like I told my boss, "I can either call you in San Diego from home or the Loop."

So far they've allowed me to cut the 3 hour daily commute
Man, I have to do my 4 minute (each way!) drive every day. It sucks. Good thing I get free soda in the office or it wouldn't be worth it.
 

ClonesFTW

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2013
5,564
9,823
113
Waukee
There's a direct correlation to down town DSM going to sh!t and when these companies went remote.
I felt bad for "Local Bites" downtown when half the town went to work from home, knew a couple of the owners pretty well from going there so often over the years. I no longer work DT so curious if they are still afloat.
 

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,788
5,930
113
30
Urbandale
I think someone earlier in the thread hit the nail on the head. It all depends on what you call productive. If you want to argue that people in general can meet their goals at home just as easy as in an office I agree. If you're arguing it's just as easy for people in general to exceed their goals from home as it is in an office I disagree.

For example, if you were working on a project that took 5 hours and that was your only goal for the day. At home, are most people really going to spend another 1-3 hours working on a second project? However, at an office, even if you screwed around on CF for an hour, chatted with your office mates about a tv show for an hour, most people would do some more work if for nothing else than to pass the time.
If I only need to do 5 hours of work on a day if I’m working from home I will get it done in 5 hours. I may then do some other stuff.

If I'm in the office I will screw around a fair amount and take 8 hours to get the work done. I’m not going to just magically come up with 3 more hours of work that I wasn’t already getting done. If I’m really struggling to stretch it out I may find something stupid and totally unrelated to my job duties to occupy myself.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: khardbored

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,427
10,030
This thread is taking a turn I never would have expected.
I assume these perverts work from home.
Lol, it's the offseason and I'm recovering from a yet another stroke so not thinking worth ****, how could you not have expected the worst:)
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: NWICY

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,874
13,950
113
I think someone earlier in the thread hit the nail on the head. It all depends on what you call productive. If you want to argue that people in general can meet their goals at home just as easy as in an office I agree. If you're arguing it's just as easy for people in general to exceed their goals from home as it is in an office I disagree.

For example, if you were working on a project that took 5 hours and that was your only goal for the day. At home, are most people really going to spend another 1-3 hours working on a second project? However, at an office, even if you screwed around on CF for an hour, chatted with your office mates about a tv show for an hour, most people would do some more work if for nothing else than to pass the time.

The REAL root cause, imho, isn't even productivity per se. It's the difficulties inherent in managing people, and the challenge of deciding "did that person do their expected share today or not?". And it's hard to tell if the expectation was fair, and its hard to tell the effort level too.

How to tell if someone who is getting stuff done, could get MORE done? Or do something more complex instead? How to tell who is slacking off, vs who is working hard but just maybe slower? How to set a deadline goal for a project that is "just right" as opposed to being unrealistic? That's very difficult to be objective in the best of circumstances. Unless you have people doing piecework, which isn't really what we're talking about here.

Example:
had an employee at my pervious employer, let's call it Cockwell Rollins. She was super highly rated at her job, but wanted more challenge. So I hired her to do a more complex job. She was totally worthless. She was a lot less capable than expected, but worse, spent most of the day watching netflix on her phone. Turns out her prior role was a small specialty sliver of work, and no one understood it but her. So it only took her a couple hours a day tops to get it done. But it was always done right, and the customer was happy. And she thought faffing around most of the day was normal. Her managers (the management role was rotational, so no one was ever there more than 12 months) never understood how little she had to do. They thought she was great. Bet her coworkers knew better though. Very typical of large corporations, imho.

Companies are unconsciously aware of how bad they (and their managers) are at this. So they do things like make everyone come in to the office all the time thinking that will help. And it might, a little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored

throwittoblythe

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2006
3,931
4,636
113
Minneapolis, MN
I work remotely full-time and if I'm being honest I'm probably about 10% less productive at home than I was in the office BUT I'm working at least 10% more due to not having a commute so it evens out.
I went full remote in Sept 2020. First job was about 50% travel. I changed to a different WFH job a year ago. This one is significantly less travel.

I'm with you: I feel less productive at home. Mainly because of my young children. Any trip downstairs for a snack or drink turns into helping out with kids. They also only respect my closed office door about half the time. When I worked in an office, I was good about staying focused and saving personal conversations for times when things were slower.

Don't get me wrong; I love being able to help my wife out in small doses throughout the day. It works well at this stage in life, but I am certainly less productive than I was in the office.

I definitely miss the comradery of the office. I used to love randomly grabbing lunch with a coworker on a nice day. I work in a very small company now and will go days without talking to anyone at work.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,459
19,620
113
I went full remote in Sept 2020. First job was about 50% travel. I changed to a different WFH job a year ago. This one is significantly less travel.

I'm with you: I feel less productive at home. Mainly because of my young children. Any trip downstairs for a snack or drink turns into helping out with kids. They also only respect my closed office door about half the time. When I worked in an office, I was good about staying focused and saving personal conversations for times when things were slower.

Don't get me wrong; I love being able to help my wife out in small doses throughout the day. It works well at this stage in life, but I am certainly less productive than I was in the office.

I definitely miss the comradery of the office. I used to love randomly grabbing lunch with a coworker on a nice day. I work in a very small company now and will go days without talking to anyone at work.

I don’t think WFH is effective if there are young kids around or TV’s are on. I think there needs to be parameters but if those are met it’s not an issue.

I’m a pretty sociable guy in most instances but I can’t remember grabbing lunch with a coworker in the last 10 years. When I’m at work, I don’t want to be there and I’ve always just had the mentality that work is for working.
 

pfgemployee

Active Member
Mar 20, 2009
68
115
33
54
Just to give an example....

"My team and leader are scattered across the country. I'm the only one that lives in the Des Moines metro. So in November, I'll be expected to drive into the office to collaborate by myself with my teammates via Teams working from home"
 

somecyguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2006
3,512
3,993
113
Example:
let's call it Cockwell Rollins.

Companies are unconsciously aware of how bad they (and their managers) are at this. So they do things like make everyone come in to the office all the time thinking that will help. And it might, a little.

I have no idea what company you are referring to.

And your point regarding managers is spot on. Too many managers are promoted past their capabilities and hence become anchors on performance rather than helping.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CascadeClone

Help Support Us

Become a patron