Agreed. But, if you can read, that's not what I said.
I did read what you said.
Agreed. But, if you can read, that's not what I said.
Too the extreme!Ownership has privileges. X is cool. Twitter was kind of soft.
And depending on how narrowly you define “return on investment” you can get some ridiculous outcomes.How about this. Cut the ******* Nazis and bull **** posts? The bots amplifying crazy ****.
How about cutting down on the porn? Think GM wants to see their ad by OnlyFans right next to it?
It was always a sloppy platform. Now it's so sloppy I don't know how a company can risk putting an ad up.
But It is what I said.Agreed. But, if you can read, that's not what I said.
San this, everything he's touched has turned to gold. It's mind boggling why people are so big on criticizing his acumen. There are plenty of other companies that have survived obstacles like this. Gander through the market and you'll find an abundance of examples. In my lifetime, Apple and Oracle come to mind when the majority of pundits at one time thought they were toast. But, hey. Let the market judge X's destiny instead of some posters with one sided knowledge.
As someone who's coolness peaked in the 90s I 100% approve this message.X is cool.
I’m not sure you really want to go with the “if you can read” idea when his comment goes to what DarkStar was saying, implying that you might not be able to read.Agreed. But, if you can read, that's not what I said.
Finally. Well said. That said, I'm sure you can see how the Hyperloop and Boring companies augment his vision of Tesla. I'm not sure they're dead yet, but definitely are not what the marketing had implied. The last sentence might be a tad subjective on your side. But, let's just agree to disagree on that one.Hyperloop? (that was ultimately a scam to try to prevent growth of normal mass transit so that he could make more money on cars?)
The Boring company (same story)
Full self driving vaporware?
There's more evidence when there's been success at places like SpaceX and Tesla its been in spite of elon, not because of elon.
LolFinally. Well said. That said, I'm sure you can see how the Hyperloop and Boring companies augment his vision of Tesla. I'm not sure they're dead yet, but definitely are not what the marketing had implied. The last sentence might be a tad subjective on your side. But, let's just agree to disagree on that one.
I'd like to see the financials. It would appear he way over paid and then, like ANY/ALL businesses, starts to cut fat to make ends meet. Subjective or not, the areas he cut, he felt could not return the investment. People complaining otherwise, probably don't understand the fiscal elements. Yes. Sad cuts. But unless you're in his shoes, you, plain and simply, do not know.
Yeah, that's the thing. The usage of the website is tied in with the name. Twitter\bird\tweet
Its one thing to do a careful rebrand after a significant amount of research and consideration. Its entirely another to do so because you're a 13 year old trapped in a 52 year old's body and still think "X" in anything is cool.
I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.I'd like to see the financials. It would appear he way over paid and then, like ANY/ALL businesses, starts to cut fat to make ends meet. Subjective or not, the areas he cut, he felt could not return the investment. People complaining otherwise, probably don't understand the fiscal elements. Yes. Sad cuts. But unless you're in his shoes, you, plain and simply, do not know.
Hyperloop? (that was ultimately a scam to try to prevent growth of normal mass transit so that he could make more money on cars?)
The Boring company (same story)
Full self driving vaporware?
There's more evidence when there's been success at places like SpaceX and Tesla its been in spite of elon, not because of elon.
...crushed agreements with third-party apps...I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.
This isn't the case of someone buying up a bad business and restoring it to success. Elon has crashed the value of what was previously a successful, well-operating business generating tons of revenue (and more importantly, tons of investment). He has also caused multiple service outages, tons of bad headlines, rolled back multiple half-baked change ideas, lost tons of advertisers (remember that 'revenue' part above?), ....
Electric car market was a huge vacuum from when oil companies and Detroit very intentionally killed it off in the 90s and literally scrapped them into cubes.
Enter $6-7 gas in the largest economy state in the US and foreign governments (not US) serious about emissions and whomever was there was going to explode in the EV market.
Gas is $6/gallon where I’m at this week, what a shocker people will look at a $1.20 alternative EVs and/or plug in hybrids.
Also, don’t forget that he took over the company right before it began to take off; when their factory opened up. A lot of other people did the hard work, he just came in and took the credit for their success.
Stock price from 2010-2018 says otherwise. Capitalized on Covid. Biggest jump during Musk anticipation. So, you're not exactly correct when you say 'never', unless you think investors are financially inept. Tons of revenue and tons of investment do not make a successful company; especially in light of their expenses. Tons of investment 'suggests' a bright future because there's buyer's optimism, but it still weighs on the books and must see a return. So, though what you wrote has some good points, one should never say 'never'.I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.
This isn't the case of someone buying up a bad business and restoring it to success. Elon has crashed the value of what was previously a successful, well-operating business generating tons of revenue (and more importantly, tons of investment). He has also caused multiple service outages, tons of bad headlines, rolled back multiple half-baked change ideas, lost tons of advertisers (remember that 'revenue' part above?), ....
Surprised he didn’t go with X4chan.com with how bigotry, racism, hatred, and fascism craziness has taken over since he fired the entire moderation team.Should have named it xX_Twitter420_Xx. Way cooler.