Thoughts on social media sites? UPDATE: Apple, IBM, Disney, etc. stopped advertising on Twitter - Musk suing

Status
Not open for further replies.

WooBadger18

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2012
15,102
13,511
113
On Wisconsin
How about this. Cut the ******* Nazis and bull **** posts? The bots amplifying crazy ****.

How about cutting down on the porn? Think GM wants to see their ad by OnlyFans right next to it?

It was always a sloppy platform. Now it's so sloppy I don't know how a company can risk putting an ad up.
And depending on how narrowly you define “return on investment” you can get some ridiculous outcomes.

After Musk’s takeover, Twitter had mass layoffs including engineers and the media relations team. In early May, Twitter had an issue where typing in “cat” or “dog” would auto file to include animal cruelty videos. Some people were reporting these videos appeared their “for you” feed.

Analysts said that safeguards preventing that from happening have a lot of redundancy, but unless Twitter intentionally turned them off, it was either unintentional or Twitter just broke. When you contact twitter for comment, you get an auto response with a poop emoji.

Those engineers or media relations personal might not seem to have a return on investment. But if I’m an advertiser, why I am going to want to advertise on a service that shows animal cruelty videos and when asked about it, responds with a poop emoji? That is not a well run company.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,509
74,256
113
Ankeny
San this, everything he's touched has turned to gold. It's mind boggling why people are so big on criticizing his acumen. There are plenty of other companies that have survived obstacles like this. Gander through the market and you'll find an abundance of examples. In my lifetime, Apple and Oracle come to mind when the majority of pundits at one time thought they were toast. But, hey. Let the market judge X's destiny instead of some posters with one sided knowledge.

Hyperloop? (that was ultimately a scam to try to prevent growth of normal mass transit so that he could make more money on cars?)
The Boring company (same story)
Full self driving vaporware?

There's more evidence when there's been success at places like SpaceX and Tesla its been in spite of elon, not because of elon.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,004
3,120
113
West Virginia
Hyperloop? (that was ultimately a scam to try to prevent growth of normal mass transit so that he could make more money on cars?)
The Boring company (same story)
Full self driving vaporware?

There's more evidence when there's been success at places like SpaceX and Tesla its been in spite of elon, not because of elon.
Finally. Well said. That said, I'm sure you can see how the Hyperloop and Boring companies augment his vision of Tesla. I'm not sure they're dead yet, but definitely are not what the marketing had implied. The last sentence might be a tad subjective on your side. But, let's just agree to disagree on that one.
 

Rabbuk

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2011
56,961
46,117
113
Finally. Well said. That said, I'm sure you can see how the Hyperloop and Boring companies augment his vision of Tesla. I'm not sure they're dead yet, but definitely are not what the marketing had implied. The last sentence might be a tad subjective on your side. But, let's just agree to disagree on that one.
Lol
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
I'd like to see the financials. It would appear he way over paid and then, like ANY/ALL businesses, starts to cut fat to make ends meet. Subjective or not, the areas he cut, he felt could not return the investment. People complaining otherwise, probably don't understand the fiscal elements. Yes. Sad cuts. But unless you're in his shoes, you, plain and simply, do not know.

He did massively overpay, which is why he tried to get out of the deal.

I don’t love Elon or hate him, like anybody in business he’s made some good calls and some bad calls. Do I think he’s somebody worth emulating, especially in his personal life? Absolutely not.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,378
66,357
113
Colorado
Yeah, that's the thing. The usage of the website is tied in with the name. Twitter\bird\tweet

Its one thing to do a careful rebrand after a significant amount of research and consideration. Its entirely another to do so because you're a 13 year old trapped in a 52 year old's body and still think "X" in anything is cool.

Pfft, brand equity can't be that important, can it?
 

MeowingCows

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2015
39,999
40,776
113
Iowa
I'd like to see the financials. It would appear he way over paid and then, like ANY/ALL businesses, starts to cut fat to make ends meet. Subjective or not, the areas he cut, he felt could not return the investment. People complaining otherwise, probably don't understand the fiscal elements. Yes. Sad cuts. But unless you're in his shoes, you, plain and simply, do not know.
I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.

This isn't the case of someone buying up a bad business and restoring it to success. Elon has crashed the value of what was previously a successful, well-operating business generating tons of revenue (and more importantly, tons of investment). He has also caused multiple service outages, tons of bad headlines, rolled back multiple half-baked change ideas, lost tons of advertisers (remember that 'revenue' part above?), ....
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,682
66,028
113
LA LA Land
Hyperloop? (that was ultimately a scam to try to prevent growth of normal mass transit so that he could make more money on cars?)
The Boring company (same story)
Full self driving vaporware?

There's more evidence when there's been success at places like SpaceX and Tesla its been in spite of elon, not because of elon.

Electric car market was a huge vacuum from when oil companies and Detroit very intentionally killed it off in the 90s and literally scrapped them into cubes.

Enter $6-7 gas in the largest economy state in the US and foreign governments (not US) serious about emissions and whomever was there was going to explode in the EV market.

Gas is $6/gallon where I’m at this week, what a shocker people will look at a $1.20 alternative EVs and/or plug in hybrids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cloneon

Turn2

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2011
22,511
26,877
113
Clusterfunkeny
I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.

This isn't the case of someone buying up a bad business and restoring it to success. Elon has crashed the value of what was previously a successful, well-operating business generating tons of revenue (and more importantly, tons of investment). He has also caused multiple service outages, tons of bad headlines, rolled back multiple half-baked change ideas, lost tons of advertisers (remember that 'revenue' part above?), ....
...crushed agreements with third-party apps...
 

SCNCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 11, 2009
10,689
8,502
113
37
La Fox, IL
Electric car market was a huge vacuum from when oil companies and Detroit very intentionally killed it off in the 90s and literally scrapped them into cubes.

Enter $6-7 gas in the largest economy state in the US and foreign governments (not US) serious about emissions and whomever was there was going to explode in the EV market.

Gas is $6/gallon where I’m at this week, what a shocker people will look at a $1.20 alternative EVs and/or plug in hybrids.

Also, don’t forget that he took over the company right before it began to take off; when their factory opened up. A lot of other people did the hard work, he just came in and took the credit for their success.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,682
66,028
113
LA LA Land
Also, don’t forget that he took over the company right before it began to take off; when their factory opened up. A lot of other people did the hard work, he just came in and took the credit for their success.

I’ll give he and the company he bought credit that they took advantage of US/Japan auto industry’s incestuous relationship w big oil.

Toyota should have had a plug in hybrid of the Prius nearly two decades ago and a full EV Prius 10-15 years ago. Detroit handed them the opportunity and the whole industry begged to be disrupted as a slave to short term profits.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,004
3,120
113
West Virginia
I don't get this line of thinking. Twitter was never a failing business. They didn't sell it to Elon because it was failing and they needed an off-ramp. They sold it to him solely because he paid 1.5X what it was worth at the time and they'd be insane not to sell it at that price, on the order of many billions more than it was worth. It may have never reached that price on its own. Certainly not within a few more years or so.

This isn't the case of someone buying up a bad business and restoring it to success. Elon has crashed the value of what was previously a successful, well-operating business generating tons of revenue (and more importantly, tons of investment). He has also caused multiple service outages, tons of bad headlines, rolled back multiple half-baked change ideas, lost tons of advertisers (remember that 'revenue' part above?), ....
Stock price from 2010-2018 says otherwise. Capitalized on Covid. Biggest jump during Musk anticipation. So, you're not exactly correct when you say 'never', unless you think investors are financially inept. Tons of revenue and tons of investment do not make a successful company; especially in light of their expenses. Tons of investment 'suggests' a bright future because there's buyer's optimism, but it still weighs on the books and must see a return. So, though what you wrote has some good points, one should never say 'never'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron