Sure it sucks that OU & UT didn't tell Big 12 they were looking to see if Big10 or SEC would have interest in letting them join for bigger $.
It is not about sucking, it is about leading and participating in Big 12 decisions without proper notification of going to the SEC being unlawful. There is a high chance UT, OU, and ESPN do not want things to go through discovery.
Where are you hearing ESPN isn't going to keep the Big12 whole?
I think that's why it's been quiet from a legal standpoint. ESPN knows it would be on the hook for 100% of money owed to Big12 through 2025. Especially now that Cincy, BYU, Houston and UCF have been added. No possible drop in Big 12 game inventory.
The 2nd factor is CFB Playoff. The SEC and OU/UT expected the change to 12 teams and 1.3B of new playoff revenue. Now that it has been tabled- the benefit of adding OU/UT isn't there quite yet.
"It's pretty obvious that the remaining 8 don't really want to get bogged down in court. After Bowlsby made his original tampering charges- it's been crickets."
Seems like you're pivoting now?
Regardless, that's right, the general thought is ESPN and technically Fox either have to make us whole to 2025, or OUT will stay. It's been quiet because there is nothing the Big 12 needs to say. And they certainly don't need to take into account OUT's wishes when scheduling out of fear of a threat of going to court.
It's just business. The Big 12 will set up divisions and scheduling that are best for the future of the Big 12. They sit on a strong hand in regards getting compensated through 2025 and are not going to schedule in fear of OUT. That likely means preventing an OUT championship game, putting OUT at as many competitive disadvantages as possible. Ideally the Big 12 would reduce the chances OUT gets the best timeslots, although not really their call.
The most unlikely scenario is OUT leaving with no agreed deal and the Big 12 keeping their TV rights up to the Big 12 amount. OUT likely challenges in court, perhaps pressures ESPN to pay them directly. Which would have implications on the ACC.
And not because the Big 12 will give concessions to avoid court. The Big 12 has the benefit of little to lose and the GOR.
Remember, we only know right now because of the A&M "leak" (imo likely intentional by the SEC). It is going to be quiet as OUT and the networks figure out if the timeline is worth moving up. That likely depended on things like CFP and NCCAA vs Johnson, and possibly other realignment moves. Potentially, the networks, primarily ESPN, are waiting on knowing what will occur in other conferences before deciding on OUT. Why spend money to move OUT before 2025 if things get blown up in 2026? Or sooner. Does ESPN plan to use the Big 12 to reach its longer term plans?
The new SEC deal kicks in a year before the Big 12 new deal. If moving OUT a year early to the SEC deal, and ESPN holds the schools in the two conferences to their current pay, does ESPN gain more on the SEC side from having OUT there than they lose on the Big 12 side? In theory, they are saving on paying OUT the Big 12 number as SEC teams,