That is the hope.And much of that has to do with BU’s athleticism and coaching.
Getting ranked and recognition at a top-10 is never worthless.once they all drop the last bit of last season’s data I’ll go back to looking more at a mix of computer rankings anyway.
The Big 12 is usually the only league with 70% or 80% good teams. Human polling is pretty worthless for our conference with that reality.
If your determined to find something to ***** about, you will always find it.Just saw we’ve now lost our 24th straight Big 12 game. Expected after last season, but that stat continued from two seasons ago.
A lot of truth in this post. There are times it is random where one team is just making the wide open looks and the other team isn't. But that for me is usually in the 1st Half when guys are fresh. In the 2nd Half of games, especially a tough defensive one, the wide open ones are overly affected by a couple of things imo.When talking about 3P shooting, there is an argument that shooting is random.
I don't subscribe to that notion. I do think Baylor's quality defense and length impacts shooting throughout the game. I think we make more open ones against a worse defense.
They definitely impact how few attempts we have. Which I love that this staff has made the team disciplined enough to not shoot themselves out of the game
Getting ranked and recognition at a top-10 is never worthless.
I don't think we're the 10th best, but we deserve to be ranked around there and it is great for the program
This. That's probably a shot he can become more consistent with sooner vs 3 pointer or midrange. Get Stinson on the horn or show him some tape...If he could get close to Curtis' level...WATCH OUTI liked seeing Hunter put up those teardrops in the paint in the last few minutes. A shot that will serve him well down the road.
A lot of truth in this post. There are times it is random where one team is just making the wide open looks and the other team isn't. But that for me is usually in the 1st Half when guys are fresh. In the 2nd Half of games, especially a tough defensive one, the wide open ones are overly affected by a couple of things imo.
1) Tired legs and overall exhaustion where mechanics are just not as fluid and precise.
2) Been pressured all day and an open look gets rushed because you've had to rush them all day
Depressing yet encouraging at the same time. I think my brain is about to bluescreen.
Now that we got that out of the way, no more losing at home.
One of the stat guys can chime in on what the exact conclusion is, but as much as I think metrics are good, if they are telling you the defense and shooting % are not highly correlated, it is sample error. Like you said, tired legs play a part. I believe they are starting to track player movement so I'm guessing soon there can be a proxy variable for the defense's impact on fatigue, as well as better assessment on how close a defender was when a shot was taken/time to take a shot, but this adage predates that.