Report: OU & Texas reach out to join SEC

trajanJ

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2008
1,464
242
63
It wouldn't surprise me if it ends up 2 mega conferences. I think the money the Big and SEC make will dwarf the PAC and ACC so much that the top properties of those conferences will bolt. The PAC first, because they are due up soon and most likely the numbers won't be enough to compete with the other 2 conferences. The Big and SEC could end up with something like 24 teams each.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agentbear

jcyclonee

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
23,262
26,176
113
Minneapolis
If the Networks don't have money, or a shrinking amount of money because of cord cutting, then how can they afford to pay some of these leagues even more money than they are now? And to your point, how healthy would college football be if there are two leagues making 20 plus mil more per team? I don't think that would work. Need a governing body, 64 teams, each school gets the same amount of tv payout.
I agree with what you are saying. Maybe I didn't state it very clearly. I did mean to state that if 32 teams make a lot more than the other 32 teams, it's probably not going to work very well.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,889
13,973
113
If this is the reality, it presents the perfect time to push ND to join a conference or get iced out.

That was my first thought too, BUT unless the playoff is literally just the 8 division winners then ND would still have a way in and would be viable as an independent.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,755
31,108
113
Behind you
That was my first thought too, BUT unless the playoff is literally just the 8 division winners then ND would still have a way in and would be viable as an independent.

Yeah but that's as part of the NCAA's CFP. If the 4 league thing happens where they break away from the NCAA, they will be able to literally write their own rules regarding independence and CFP qualifiers.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CascadeClone

surly

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2013
9,690
4,088
113
reservation lake, mn
This reminds me of the German officer prior to Normandy wondering: would the Allies reconquer France, driving the Germans out, the thought being dismal; perhaps there would be some kind of peace settlement with Germany surrendering France and Poland but keeping Austria and Czechoslovakia, that seemed better; but the only happy ending would be Rommel's army pushing the invaders back into the sea.

We know how that ended.
 

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,569
23,994
113
I"m more reminded of the Yalta Conference at the end of WWII when Roosevelt (Big 10), Churchill (Pac 12), and Stalin (ACC) met to discuss how to reorganize Germany/Europe (the Big 12).
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
There are currently 66 P5 teams (this includes ND). So which current P5 school bows out? Baylor?

There are 65 including ND: 14+14+14+12+10+1.

I don’t think ND would join a conference, but I still think someone would get left out, and someone would get promoted:

Iowa State and Kansas to B1G

Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, TCU, and Kansas State to Pac-16

West Virginia and Cincinnati to ACC (swap ND for Cincy if you think we can make them join)

Baylor to American

Actually I could also see KU and ND to the B1G, Tech/OSU/KSU/ISU to Pac-16, WVU and Cincy to ACC, TCU and Baylor to American.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,628
23,887
113
Macomb, MI
I"m more reminded of the Yalta Conference at the end of WWII when Roosevelt (Big 10), Churchill (Pac 12), and Stalin (ACC) met to discuss how to reorganize Germany/Europe (the Big 12).

As long as we end up in one of the three conferences, make us a treaty ***** :D

There are 65 including ND: 14+14+14+12+10+1.

I don’t think ND would join a conference, but I still think someone would get left out, and someone would get promoted:

Iowa State and Kansas to B1G

Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, TCU, and Kansas State to Pac-16

West Virginia and Cincinnati to ACC (swap ND for Cincy if you think we can make them join)

Baylor to American

Actually I could also see KU and ND to the B1G, Tech/OSU/KSU/ISU to Pac-16, WVU and Cincy to ACC, TCU and Baylor to American.

I honestly think it's ND to the ACC or working around their independence. I just don't ever see ND to the Big 10 ever happening to this point - bridges have been burned to the point where I think they're irreparable between the two parties. ND doesn't even have its annual rivalry games with UM and MSU anymore. Yes, they still have their annual game with Purdue and they did schedule Wisconsin this year, but beyond Purdue, anything scheduled with the Big 10 seems to be on a case-by-case basis. Ever since ND allied itself with the ACC the only people that think ND to the Big 10 is still a thing are those that have their heads stuck in the 1990s. At this point the only way I ever see ND in the Big 10 is if CFB devolves to the point where only the Big 10 and SEC are the remaining superconferences.
 

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,823
2,193
113
Houston
Pac-12 and the Big 10 will be and have always been joined at the hip. We can't count on them to save us.. We can though start to cause some network conflict. Bowlsby already started it with ESPN. Though it pains me to say, ESPN and SEC may be our only shot on staying sort of relevant and having a decent conference money payout. We can play both sides (Fox - Big 10, Pac-12 versus ESPN - SEC). Not sure where ACC stands. If the Fox alliance is going to give us the middle finger, we need to keep the SEC - ESPN alliance open. We have some leverage with ESPN with their meddling (cease and desist). Also, with every year Texas remains in the Big 12 is another $15 million down the drain for ESPN for the LHN.

ESPN has deals with BYU and AAC. Like done with us, we poach Cinci, Houston, Central Florida, Memphis, South Florida. Hate leaving out the rest of the AAC. But that ESPN money can go to the Big 12. Fox would not be pleased with more teams siding with ESPN and vice versa. That is 14 teams. We may be the swing vote for the CFP network in several years too.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Cyclones1969

HawaiiClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2020
743
279
63
First, there was one regular season game last year (Wisc-Northwestern) that got 4 mil last year that did not include a blue blood. All the rest were SEC, OU, UT, OSU, ND, Clemson and Michigan. There were no PAC regular season games that did that. If the analysis is "be a blue blood or you don't add value to a conference," that's not very good analysis. The point is, if schools like Okie St. and ISU don't bring value to conferences, then based on the value of TV viewership a good chunk of teams in these power conferences don't either.

Second, you can't look at the conference as a monolith. Okie St. and Iowa State would both be the 3rd most watched team in the PAC. So they would absolutely boost the average viewership of the conferences games.

Third - everybody needs to understand that the decision on a team getting an invite is not a simple binary yes or no. Much like Maryland and Rutgers, there will be bargaining for media revenue shares and schedules. If a school takes a significantly reduced cut of media rights for a few years, the bar becomes pretty low for that school to bring value to the rest of the members.

Finally - A big 12 team absolutely wouldn't accept an offer to bolt right now. You not only jeopardize the action against OU, UT and ESPN, you put yourself in a GoR bind. Considering the time it's going to take for all the Big 12 mess to settle, it would be messy for any other conference to get tangled up in the Big 12 until the dust settles, which probably means 2022.

Bottom line is can schools like Ok St and ISU bring value to the PAC? Yes. But is it enough for another conference to get tangled up in this mess right now? No. And could either school afford to leave or get to far down that road before the legal matters are sorted out? No.
Some time over the next year I suspect OU and UT will agree to write checks, and the rest of the teams will then agree that the remaining members can go negotiate to find landing spots. That’s when things will get interesting.
Could the Big 8 programs work together now to help each program find a power conference landing spot so that the GoR wouldn't be an issue?
 

cayin

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
10,120
10,386
113
There are 65 including ND: 14+14+14+12+10+1.

I don’t think ND would join a conference, but I still think someone would get left out, and someone would get promoted:

Iowa State and Kansas to B1G

Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, TCU, and Kansas State to Pac-16

West Virginia and Cincinnati to ACC (swap ND for Cincy if you think we can make them join)

Baylor to American

Actually I could also see KU and ND to the B1G, Tech/OSU/KSU/ISU to Pac-16, WVU and Cincy to ACC, TCU and Baylor to American.
Yes, 65 teams instead of 66. I like your top scenario the best, I think most of us do
 

cyspy

Active Member
Jul 24, 2011
595
164
43
There are 65 teams currently in the 5 "power" conferences. Let Notre Dame keep it's independence and then put the rest into 4,16 team conferences. 4X16=64. Just use some simple math,geography and maybe just a pinch of reshuffling and there you go. However the problem is that these things aren't being used by those in charge. They are using money,politics,population and location to make these decisions.
 

HawaiiClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2020
743
279
63
There are 65 including ND: 14+14+14+12+10+1.

I don’t think ND would join a conference, but I still think someone would get left out, and someone would get promoted:

Iowa State and Kansas to B1G

Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, TCU, and Kansas State to Pac-16

West Virginia and Cincinnati to ACC (swap ND for Cincy if you think we can make them join)

Baylor to American

Actually I could also see KU and ND to the B1G, Tech/OSU/KSU/ISU to Pac-16, WVU and Cincy to ACC, TCU and Baylor to American.
In the first scenario, how about TCU and UCF to SEC since they can afford to absorb 2 more teams (3 six team pods) and Baylor to Pac 16?
 

ForeverIowan

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
1,770
3,123
113


1. SEC currently sits at 16 teams

2. ACC adds Notre Dame and West Virginia to form a 16 team conference.

3. Big Ten adds Iowa State and Kansas to form a 16 team conference.

4. Pac 12 adds four of these teams to form a 16 team conference: Oklahoma State, Kansas State, Texas Tech, TCU, Baylor, BYU.

If the ultimate goal and requirement for these four conferences is to get to 16 teams and split from the NCAA and hire a commissioner this seems like the logical end result. Nothing about all of this has been logical however so it is anyone's best guess.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,755
31,108
113
Behind you
1. SEC currently sits at 16 teams

2. ACC adds Notre Dame and West Virginia to form a 16 team conference.

3. Big Ten adds Iowa State and Kansas to form a 16 team conference.

4. Pac 12 adds four of these teams to form a 16 team conference: Oklahoma State, Kansas State, Texas Tech, TCU, Baylor, BYU.

If the ultimate goal and requirement for these four conferences is to get to 16 teams and split from the NCAA and hire a commissioner this seems like the logical end result. Nothing about all of this has been logical however so it is anyone's best guess.

I'd bet the B1G and other conferences are going to do what's in their best interest and not necessarily march in lockstep towards 16 just because that's what seems most logical across the board. If it doesn't bring $$$, don't bet on it. And the B1G is operating from a much stronger position than the Pac and ACC. It's not going to line up shoulder-to-shoulder in realignment with conferences who bring in barely half the $$$ payouts per school.
 

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
As long as we end up in one of the three conferences, make us a treaty ***** :D



I honestly think it's ND to the ACC or working around their independence. I just don't ever see ND to the Big 10 ever happening to this point - bridges have been burned to the point where I think they're irreparable between the two parties. ND doesn't even have its annual rivalry games with UM and MSU anymore. Yes, they still have their annual game with Purdue and they did schedule Wisconsin this year, but beyond Purdue, anything scheduled with the Big 10 seems to be on a case-by-case basis. Ever since ND allied itself with the ACC the only people that think ND to the Big 10 is still a thing are those that have their heads stuck in the 1990s. At this point the only way I ever see ND in the Big 10 is if CFB devolves to the point where only the Big 10 and SEC are the remaining superconferences.
ND will never go to the Big 10 for 2 simple reason, the Big 10 will never allow them to be a part time member of the league for football, keeping their independence, and the Big 10 will never allow them to keep their NBC contract. If they do the second then very quickly Ohio State will also ask for the same deal, to set up their own network, and thereby undermining BTN.

Unless the Big 10 is willing to give on those two issue, it will never happen, but the ACC was more than willing to allow it.
 

ForeverIowan

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2013
1,770
3,123
113
I'd bet the B1G and other conferences are going to do what's in their best interest and not necessarily march in lockstep towards 16 just because that's what seems most logical across the board. If it doesn't bring $$$, don't bet on it. And the B1G is operating from a much stronger position than the Pac and ACC. It's not going to line up shoulder-to-shoulder in realignment with conferences who bring in barely half the $$$ payouts per school.

There are so many unknowns and so much to consider you can go around in circles all day. If the four conferences split from the NCAA and hire a commissioner of sorts perhaps it becomes a league requirement to get to 16 teams. I of course don't have the answers. The only hole I can currently poke in Herbstreit's four conferences consisting of 16 teams theory is how in the world would the playoffs work? Common logic you'd think the winner of each conference makes a four team playoff. I dont think the powers down in the SEC are going to be okay with a conference consisting of Bama, LSU, Georgia, Florida, A&M, Texas, OU only getting one seat at the table however.

Perhaps if 64 is the end goal while also moving away from the NCAA could you blow up the traditional conferences altogether? Create new conferences doing your best to evenly balance the strength of conferences while also honoring geographical/traditional rivalries? How does revenue sharing work? If there is no NCAA there will be a lot more $. How do you appease the major players like Texas and Ohio State? I think we can all admit Iowa State shouldn't get the same piece of the pie as Ohio State. People smarter than me need to sit down and have these conversations and figure the dang thing out.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,755
31,108
113
Behind you
There are so many unknowns and so much to consider you can go around in circles all day. If the four conferences split from the NCAA and hire a commissioner of sorts perhaps it becomes a league requirement to get to 16 teams. I of course don't have the answers. The only hole I can currently poke in Herbstreit's four conferences consisting of 16 teams theory is how in the world would the playoffs work? Common logic you'd think the winner of each conference makes a four team playoff. I dont think the powers down in the SEC are going to be okay with a conference consisting of Bama, LSU, Georgia, Florida, A&M, Texas, OU only getting one seat at the table however.

Perhaps if 64 is the end goal while also moving away from the NCAA could you blow up the traditional conferences altogether? Create new conferences doing your best to evenly balance the strength of conferences while also honoring geographical/traditional rivalries? How does revenue sharing work? If there is no NCAA there will be a lot more $. How do you appease the major players like Texas and Ohio State? I think we can all admit Iowa State shouldn't get the same piece of the pie as Ohio State. People smarter than me need to sit down and have these conversations and figure the dang thing out.

Totally agree, it's all a big unknown. I just don't see a situation where the B1G is going to expand in a way where it works with the Pac and ACC to make sure everything is equitable and everyone is happy. If it's going to be better for the B1G coffers to go after USC, Oregon, UCLA, Washington, I don't think they're going to not do that just so it can to grow in sync with the Pac and ACC.
 

Cyclones1969

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
8,885
6,077
113
55
I'd bet the B1G and other conferences are going to do what's in their best interest and not necessarily march in lockstep towards 16 just because that's what seems most logical across the board. If it doesn't bring $$$, don't bet on it. And the B1G is operating from a much stronger position than the Pac and ACC. It's not going to line up shoulder-to-shoulder in realignment with conferences who bring in barely half the $$$ payouts per school.

They’ll do like they’ve done in every scenario that arises, ask Gene Smith what Ohio State wants to do first, then call Michigan second to see if they’re ok with what OSU wants, and finally calls Penn St to let them know what the other two want to do.

after that, they tell the rest of you what’s going to happen.

I know you’re like the rest of the hawks, loving the dream Iowa State goes to the Mac. But you’re really showing to be a poor man’s version of the Michigan State guy that was posting here.
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,755
31,108
113
Behind you
They’ll do like they’ve done in every scenario that arises, ask Gene Smith what Ohio State wants to do first, then call Michigan second to see if they’re ok with what OSU wants, and finally calls Penn St to let them know what the other two want to do.

after that, they tell the rest of you what’s going to happen.

I know you’re like the rest of the hawks, loving the dream Iowa State goes to the Mac. But you’re really showing to be a poor man’s version of the Michigan State guy that was posting here.

I don't blame you for being salty.

Iowa gets the same $$$ payout as OSU, Mich, PSU.

I've said from the start I hope ISU stays in a P5 conference and would like it if they got a B1G invite because it's better for the state and it'd be fun to be conference rivals.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron