Right, they were never really a 4 seed. But now may (and probably won't) make it in at all.That seems extreme.
Right, they were never really a 4 seed. But now may (and probably won't) make it in at all.That seems extreme.
I think losing Garza would be a much bigger blow than losing Wieskamp, which is a good thing considering Garza's not likely to leave. I'd say it's 90% likely both will be back next year.
JW reminds me a little of Uthoff. He can be really good but then just totally disappears at times. He's a bit overrated, but a nice roll player.And it's not even close. Garza draws so much attention and opens up the floor. Lil Weezy and Garza are a heck of a one-two combo though.
Garza back for sure. He has no shot at being drafted.
Wieskamp feels 50/50. If he finishes the season well he can be a mid second rounder. If he comes back he'll be too old for what he is to ever get drafted imo.
Is anyone a fan of Fran? Maybe his entitled children?I've heard Wieskamp is expected to come back and probably leave after his junior year. He loves Iowa City and his teammates I guess. There is still talk he could leave after this year though. He's not a fan of Fran and his girlfriend is a senior but I still think he'll be back
Is anyone a fan of Fran? Maybe his entitled children?
bump for @HawkJRP
Lol!
You think losing on the road to 2 bubble teams would drop them 4 lines?
I stand by what I said, Iowa is going to be sweating on Selection Sunday.
Sounds like Fredrick is out 6 to 8 weeks.Don't get me wrong, misery loves company, and I would love to see Fran snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, BUT...
Iowa's non-con is decent, the win vs TTech looks good. ESPN is talking up the B1G. If they win 2 or 3 more games (incl conf tournament) they will be in. .500 in conf, or 9-11 with a conf tournament win, they will get in.
It could be pretty sweaty though, if they only get 2 more wins...
I would think they will win 2-3 of their remaining games, plus a conf tournament game - WITH Frederick. So I think they are OK. Caveat is Frederick: if he is out, then who knows, maybe they lose out.
He's not a ROLE player. jfcJW reminds me a little of Uthoff. He can be really good but then just totally disappears at times. He's a bit overrated, but a nice roll player.
He's the second best player and likely some sort of all-conference member.He's not a ROLE player. jfc
30....What's their NET ranking today? They'll be unranked in the AP poll Monday
Tell adjl that.He's the second best player and likely some sort of all-conference member.
30....
I can't stand Garza, but he is good and opens up the floor for everyone else. JW is a good shooter and sometimes gets to the bucket but has way more opportunities because everyone is focused on Garza. He also disappears a lot and when other teams want to shut him down, they do. That's why I would say a strong role player and not a star. He gets stats because of Garza. He's a perfect, sit in the corner and hit 3 guy. Nothing wrong with that. Every team needs them.Tell adjl that.