True but a similar argument could be made with Baylor. Baylor's SOS is weaker than Minnesota's.
Baylor has beaten a good team. Minnesota hasn't
True but a similar argument could be made with Baylor. Baylor's SOS is weaker than Minnesota's.
0-3 IMHO.I think if Minnesota wins 1 out of the three of PSU, Iowa, and Wiscy, they are a real solid team. If they win two they are really really good. If they win 3 then they are in the Big 10 title game with potential to make the playoff (which I absolutely do not see happening). Lol
Baylor has beaten Iowa State though, which is a good win. And if you're using the "respected" AP poll, Baylor and Minnesota both are 6-0, yet Baylor is rated higher. So obviously the voters are questioning how good Minnesota is and believe Baylor is better right now.True but a similar argument could be made with Baylor. Baylor's SOS is weaker than Minnesota's.
Yeah, even in their fakest ID year Iowa beat Wisconsin and Northwestern on the road (I think). To reach that level of faux-competitiveness, the Gophs would have to at least match wins like that. Doubtful.
I used the AP poll because I assumed it was the "go to" poll on this board. My apologies....Baylor has beaten Iowa State though, which is a good win. And if you're using the "respected" AP poll, Baylor and Minnesota both are 6-0, yet Baylor is rated higher. So obviously the voters are questioning how good Minnesota is and believe Baylor is better right now.
Didn't Wisconsin have to fumble it on 4th and goal to give that game to Iowa?
Didn't Wisconsin have to fumble it on 4th and goal to give that game to Iowa?
You're fine. I'm sure everyone has their different opinions on every poll. All of them are weird and none really matter but the CFB playoff poll.I used the AP poll because I assumed it was the "go to" poll on this board. My apologies....
no, the quarterback had an open field to score from like 10 yards out, and tripped over a painted line marker.
How wasn't that win "earned"? Turnovers are part of the game.omg thats right (and even more embarrassing).
Yet Iowa fans acted like they earned it. That's literally a gift.
There's a stat about turnovers and luck, and although some turnovers happen to be lucky, a lot of them come from guys knowing where to be and having the skill to make the play.How wasn't that win "earned"? Turnovers are part of the game.
Crickets from @iahawks and @dexterhawk .Chose your charity and lets make a bet if Minnesota finishes ranked.
There's a stat about turnovers and luck, and although some turnovers happen to be lucky, a lot of them come from guys knowing where to be and having the skill to make the play.
I don't bet on the boat rower.
D-back interceptions are usually caused by great technique and correct coverage. King was phenomenal at doing both of those things and that's why he's playing on Sundays.Yep, Desmond King had two INTs and Drew Ott had a strip sack. Great players and Hawks.
How wasn't that win "earned"? Turnovers are part of the game.
D-back interceptions are usually caused by great technique and correct coverage. King was phenomenal at doing both of those things and that's why he's playing on Sundays.
Iowa caused him to trip on his own accord?
Yep, Desmond King had two INTs and Drew Ott had a strip sack. Great players and Hawks.
Iowa also had two Turnovers and a missed FG in that game.
Our DT blew up the play and was in the backfield during the QB/RB exchange.