Which assessment of the quality of team with respect to the conference is more accurate, polls and predictions in September or assessments after 20+ games? I get it, you’re concerned with what the latter may say about the staff. That’s telling, but nevertheless, recall this started by someone alluding to being surprised by mid-February angst over a possible season outcome by referencing an absolutely obsolete guess. That’s some great coping.
Another example of gaming expectations- tank so badly in Year 3 that it lowers preseason expectations for Year 4, which is likely a local peak year the following season. Brilliant.