I-35 / US 30 Flyover Progress

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,440
17,396
113
There is probably plenty of blame to go around. Surely multiple parties had to be involved in the mistake. Someone built it wrong, but someone else may have told them to build it wrong, and someone else surely watched it be built wrong even though there job was to catch mistakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored

1100011CS

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2007
16,125
5,845
113
Marshalltown
  • Agree
Reactions: 2020cy

ArgentCy

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
20,405
11,148
113
Glad to see you've now added Construction Engineer to your expertise

It is much closer to my degree than what I do now. It's not hard to figure out that rebar embedded in concrete isn't going to change in elevation. As someone else noted they have to be doing some redesign somewhere as well.
 

Brandon

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2014
6,942
7,805
113
Taking them off-rent is quite a bit different than getting them repo'd. If I had major rework like that and wouldn't be using those cranes for a decent amount of time, I'd definitely off-rent them (unless mob/demob was hefty).
They werent making the rental payments
 

SayMyName

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2017
1,012
1,749
113
ABQ
I'm sure it will be, it's just odd that they are out there jack hammering to get them to grade.
My impression was that they aren't jack hammering to lower the height, rather they need to expose the rebar cage to give the new pour material the necessary bonding and reinforments. I think at least some of the piers are too low in height and they actually need to raise the elevation. (New KCCI info indicates as much, although it sounds like elevations at all piers and ramps at either end are all over the place.)

The other aspect is the anchor bolts and embed plates were mislocated (or missing altogether), so they would need the fresh concrete at the top in order to place those critical elements.
 

scottie33

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
2,711
115
63
40
Ames, Iowa
My impression was that they aren't jack hammering to lower the height, rather they need to expose the rebar cage to give the new pour material the necessary bonding and reinforments. I think at least some of the piers are too low in height and they actually need to raise the elevation. (New KCCI info indicates as much, although it sounds like elevations at all piers and ramps at either end are all over the place.)

The other aspect is the anchor bolts and embed plates were mislocated (or missing altogether), so they would need the fresh concrete at the top in order to place those critical elements.

I am in agreement with you that I don't believe the piers were poured 6" too high. If they were 6" too high they would have to cut out all of the rebar in the top of the piers as the finish elevation of the concrete pier would be lower than the existing reinforcing if they just left it in place. The size of reinforcing in those piers also wouldn't allow enough development length by chipping down 18" to install new reinforcing for a 6" lower finish elevation...you'd have to install hundreds of rebar couplers which is crazy to think of.

I have not watched the KCCI video footage to see if there are anchor bolts even installed in the piers but driving by I can't see any sticking up out of the piers.

As of yesterday, they started installing forms at the South pier top.

What is astonishing is the Liq. Damages are $5,000+/day you would think they would work more than 5 days per week and be working on every pier...unless the schedule is such that there is no benefit in having all the pier tops fixed if the bridge girders are no where near ready to be delivered and installed completely.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Doc

JP4CY

Lord, beer me strength.
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2008
74,648
95,705
113
Testifying
I am in agreement with you that I don't believe the piers were poured 6" too high. If they were 6" too high they would have to cut out all of the rebar in the top of the piers as the finish elevation of the concrete pier would be lower than the existing reinforcing if they just left it in place. The size of reinforcing in those piers also wouldn't allow enough development length by chipping down 18" to install new reinforcing for a 6" lower finish elevation...you'd have to install hundreds of rebar couplers which is crazy to think of.

I have not watched the KCCI video footage to see if there are anchor bolts even installed in the piers but driving by I can't see any sticking up out of the piers.

As of yesterday, they started installing forms at the South pier top.

What is astonishing is the Liq. Damages are $5,000+/day you would think they would work more than 5 days per week and be working on every pier...unless the schedule is such that there is no benefit in having all the pier tops fixed if the bridge girders are no where near ready to be delivered and installed completely.
A lot of girders are sitting in that valley.
 

scottie33

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
2,711
115
63
40
Ames, Iowa
A lot of girders are sitting in that valley.

Cool Fact - There is 4.5 Million pounds of structural steel for the bridge girders.

If I counted correctly, there are 75 bridge girders that will be installed when complete.

I watched the KCCI report and see that they used sleeves for the anchor bolts...not sure why you wouldn't just build an anchor bolt template to hold them into place during placement of concrete.
 

justincl

Member
Apr 11, 2006
102
24
18
Cool Fact - There is 4.5 Million pounds of structural steel for the bridge girders.

If I counted correctly, there are 75 bridge girders that will be installed when complete.

I watched the KCCI report and see that they used sleeves for the anchor bolts...not sure why you wouldn't just build an anchor bolt template to hold them into place during placement of concrete.

It’s fairly common on larger bridges to utilize sleeves for anchor bolts. They were used on the Kate Shelly railroad bridge too for example.

Hope all is well with you!

JC