Purdue
- Thread starter marothisu
- Start date
FFS, it's a Cyclone message board. What did you expect? Everything I've read people have been mostly courteous. Yet you chose to focus on a couple of posts/posters and get all defensive and start acting like a tool. As I said in a prior post, check out Nevada's posts if you want to see the best way to interact on a competitor message board. You don't need to "bow down"...just don't be an ass.
I hope you mean it when you say you're leaving now. You've brought nothing to the discussion about tonight's game.
Funny reading the Purdue board. One fan thinks we aren't as good as Vermont and will lose by 20+ because of their size.
I don't recall even losing by 15+ this year but I guess this amazing Purdue team is going to beat us by 20+.
Also another fan thought we weren't that good because we have 10 losses. I guess SOS means nothing, we must just suck.
I don't recall even losing by 15+ this year but I guess this amazing Purdue team is going to beat us by 20+.
Also another fan thought we weren't that good because we have 10 losses. I guess SOS means nothing, we must just suck.
Back to the actual game talk. As I said earlier, Swanigan is going to be a problem, but as someone else also pointed out, Edwards going off from 3 could also be problematic. Will be interesting to see if we double Swanigan
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
He called himself simple earlier. It shouldn't be a surprise that he's way behind on the times, like Purdue basketball will be tonight.
Swanigan was a problem for every team this year, and they still lost 7 games. The key is to keep him around his average. I'm confident we can take care of the rest of their team. If Swanigan has a career night, we'll lose.
It sure is. It is as relevant as anything you've been spouting in this thread. That's for sure!
I've commented generally earlier this season solely on the Big Ten's ranking by objective and well-accepted metrics. And, of course, you really can't say much about the relative "strength" of a conference based upon the result from a single game, or even upon the results of the NCAA tournament. However, the Big Ten's record in the tournament is not particularly good this year so far (5-2 is blase if you think you're world beaters).
I get it. You're one of those guys who would declare climate change a lie because it snows on one occasion. You climb back into your trailer and apply your "eye test".
Last edited:
It's actually a 6-3 record (the big 12 is 5-3). And that's with several lower seed upsets in there.
It is now. Back to your trailer with you. The numbers will change each time a team from one of the conferences in question plays. Wait a few hours and your post won't be accurate anymore either. I'm really impressed though. You really schooled me there.
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Good game. Hell of acomeback. You've got a good team. Thought I'd come back and congratulate you for a great season.
