Because Iowa or any B1G outside Ohio State would not be man enough to go through a schedule like you are describing.
Oh, BTW, this is exactly what ISU's schedule was this year.
Anyone that thinks the ISU/Iowa game will end is delusional. It won't happen, heads would roll. Think Michigan or USC will stop playing Notre Dame? Nope. You want to be in a big-time conference you better be ready to play big-time games.
Anyone that thinks the ISU/Iowa game will end is delusional. It won't happen, heads would roll. Think Michigan or USC will stop playing Notre Dame? Nope. You want to be in a big-time conference you better be ready to play big-time games.
Congrats. Proud of you.
Anyone that thinks the ISU/Iowa game will end is delusional. It won't happen, heads would roll. Think Michigan or USC will stop playing Notre Dame? Nope. You want to be in a big-time conference you better be ready to play big-time games.
Anyone that thinks the ISU/Iowa game will end is delusional. It won't happen, heads would roll. Think Michigan or USC will stop playing Notre Dame? Nope. You want to be in a big-time conference you better be ready to play big-time games.
In the article, Delaney says the B1G will likely rethink its move to a 9-game conference schedule. This will likely play a big role.
Hawk fans are falling on tough times in the near future...
Wait...what?
The big 12 should look at doing something like this too. Do 8 conf games, and maybe get a deal done with the ACC to guarantee we all have 9 BCS opponents a year to keep our tv partners happy.