I am having a hard time with my bracket picking a winner. It's just a weird year. Houston is banged up. I can't see UCONN repeating just because it is so difficult. Purdue and Painter always choke.
Auburn?If only there were another option. Maybe someone in the East if you don’t see UCONN repeating. I’ll have to look through the seedlings in that region, maybe there’s some team that’s right below UCONN that could be considered?
I can't see ISU winning either. I mean it would be fun to pick them but I can't see it. I can see them making a final four. I can't see Tennessee winning. Can't see Zona winning.If only there were another option. Maybe someone in the East if you don’t see UCONN repeating. I’ll have to look through the seedlings in that region, maybe there’s some team that’s right below UCONN that could be considered?
I'm the same. There's always something for each of these teams that makes me think they won't win it. I think Creighton is in a good spot or sleeper team to win whole thing but then part of thinks that's bracket suicide.I can't see ISU winning either. I mean it would be fun to pick them but I can't see it. I can see them making a final four. I can't see Tennessee winning. Can't see Zona winning.
I’ve always found it weird that the play in games are for both a 10 seed (decent chance to advance) and a 16 (virtually no chance to advance). I guess playing as a 16 it’s nice because you have a chance to earn a NCAA tourny win but always struck me as odd that it’s those two seeds.View attachment 125877
First games tonight
It's not always a 10 seed, it's been 11 or even 12 in the past, just whatever the lowest at-large teams end up at.I’ve always found it weird that the play in games are for both a 10 seed (decent chance to advance) and a 16 (virtually no chance to advance). I guess playing as a 16 it’s nice because you have a chance to earn a NCAA tourny win but always struck me as odd that it’s those two seeds.
Agreed, I should have specified this season, still always feels very arbitrary to me for some reason.It's not always a 10 seed, it's been 11 or even 12 in the past, just whatever the lowest at-large teams end up at.
I’m not sure they’ve ever been as high as 10 seeds before. They’re only that high because we had 5 bid stealers this year.It's not always a 10 seed, it's been 11 or even 12 in the past, just whatever the lowest at-large teams end up at.
When this criteria is touted, it always says "at the end of the season". It's never clarified if that means after the regular season, after the conference tournament, or after the NCAA tournament. It's not hard to imagine that winning 6 games in a row against tournament teams would push your numbers into the stratosphere.This is the year Iowa State breaks KenPom’s historical NC criteria (top 25 efficiency, top 37 offense, top 38 defense, top 45 SoS). Ken says only UConn, Houston, Purdue, Az, Tenn, UNC, Creighton, and Marquette can win it. He’s got us at 55th on offense, but can our #1 rated defense overcome?