Would you give up football NIL

Nolaeer

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
787
960
93
I would rather everyone on here take a look at their budgets and make a monthly donation of some sort to We Will so we can be competitive in both.
No! Unless you earn well over $100,000 a year and all your kids are already finished with college, you should support your school of choice through attendance and buying tickets, not NIL donations to college athletes who will likely earn more than you've ever made.

The average folks help more through metrics like butts in the seat and TV ratings. Some schools have billionaire donors, and it is simply impossible for schools without billionaire donors to keep up in the arms race.

I mean, sure, if you have expendable income that is currently being used for gambling on games or political donations, why not? However, if you're considering the price of coffee or eggs, chances are your money is better spent in your pocket.
 

Dopey

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2009
3,258
2,111
113
It’s not a stupid question. We’re last in the Big XII in NIL and last I knew it wasn’t close. Choices will eventually have to be made.

Are we really? Are our alumni just too practical or not successful?

I get Texas oil. But where does K State, West Virginia, UCF, etc get their money?
 

FarmerCy1

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2020
229
379
63
40
Are we really? Are our alumni just too practical or not successful?

I get Texas oil. But where does K State, West Virginia, UCF, etc get their money?
I believe K State’s comes from the Koch Brothers and West Virginia’s come from some coal family- not sure where UCF’s comes from.
 

Dopey

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2009
3,258
2,111
113
No! Unless you earn well over $100,000 a year and all your kids are already finished with college, you should support your school of choice through attendance and buying tickets, not NIL donations to college athletes who will likely earn more than you've ever made.

The average folks help more through metrics like butts in the seat and TV ratings. Some schools have billionaire donors, and it is simply impossible for schools without billionaire donors to keep up in the arms race.

I mean, sure, if you have expendable income that is currently being used for gambling on games or political donations, why not? However, if you're considering the price of coffee or eggs, chances are your money is better spent in your pocket.

This is it for me. I don’t donate. Could I? Certainly. But I have young kids. And until their college is funded… I’ve taken them to Disney world…. Updated the kitchen in our house… etc etc etc…. NIL just won’t be a priority for me.

Someday, maybe. But the “threat” of ISU being left behind in athletics isn’t enough for me to reallocate my dollars from things I mentioned above.
 

Jayshellberg

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 4, 2016
1,805
3,622
113
59
Omaha
To switch all NIL to basketball for a couple years to compete for the national title? I’m getting to the point where it’s would rather compete for a national title in basketball than competing more for stuff in n football.

I just don’t think we will ever compete for anything in football.
What makes you think allocating all our NIL resources to basketball would be sufficient to complete for a Natty. If we did that, the money spent on basketball would STILL be less than 50% of what the biggest NIL programs spend.
 

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,227
4,063
113
Silly question but I’ll give a serious answer.

Baylor and UConn have both won basketball titles the past decade, however the SEC and B1G aren’t clawing over each other to add them to their leagues where the big money is. ISU is never getting that invite either, but football is still king in realignment.

Yes we could all cheer for eternity about a hoops title, but it’s not the be all end all for the long term health of ISU sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaCyclone

1SEIACLONE

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2024
2,520
2,358
113
63
Ames Iowa
Both ISU and EIU suffer without a major donor or two willing to invest 10's. of millions into the program, without that, both schools will struggle getting large amounts of NIL money. Sorry but the average fan, donating $50 or $100 dollars a month is not going to change the equation enough to make a difference. Both schools are stuck where they are, and I see no way out of the solution as long as NIL stays the way it currently is.
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
12,425
10,763
113
Des Moines
yep, there is so much of our fan base that doesn't give to our NIL. I think they don't understand. I mentioned in another thread I'm in a group chat with 5 other Cyclone fans. I implored them to donate to the collective. Here is the response to one of the guys in the chat. "I don't mind giving money via buying tickets, beer at a game, and even parking. But somehow raising money to expressly pay a 19 year old to play for us..just seems wierd to me."

I explained to him if we want great players to come here we have to pay, we may not like the way college athletics is going, but reality we need to pay. Anyway, I don't think a lot of our fans understand. If they are not on Cyclone Fanatic how would they know the situation. I have other Cyclone fans at my work, they have no idea about the collecitive or how it works. I will hit them up too.
I don't think this is it at all. I think people fully understand. What you guys need to understand is there is a certain percentage of people that just aren't going to participate for whatever reason.

In this current climate I don't blame them. I just went to Costco the other night, avocados have gone up $2 since January 20th, almonds about $2, salmon is now $37 bucks and it was around $33. My health insurance just went up another $100 bucks a year, property taxes went up, just got a letter in the mail from Mid-American my rates are going up.

When will it ever be enough? What's my cutoff, this year if I give $100 will it expected to be $1000, if i only give 10 bucks am I any less of a fan than someone who gave $50?

I already attended 2 games this year and with ticket demand that set me back about $350 bucks. Last year I spent almost $1000 going to see ISU in the Ncaa tourney.

It's just more, more,,more, more, more........while meanwhile we've been fear mongererd for 4 years now about how ISU athletics will be in the MAC soon, meanwhile we just played in the CCG in football and had back to back 3 seeds.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: deadeyededric

Nor'MidWester

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2016
1,787
2,591
113
To switch all NIL to basketball for a couple years to compete for the national title? I’m getting to the point where it’s would rather compete for a national title in basketball than competing more for stuff in n football.

I just don’t think we will ever compete for anything in football.
First of all no one's spending $20 mil on basketball. Second of all we won't have the $20 mil to spend if we abandon football.
 

CyLyte2

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2020
1,686
2,180
113
48
To switch all NIL to basketball for a couple years to compete for the national title? I’m getting to the point where it’s would rather compete for a national title in basketball than competing more for stuff in n football.

I just don’t think we will ever compete for anything in football.
We were one game from the playoff last year. This would be the single dumbest thing ISU could do. Fortunately the people running the show are that dumb.
 

cyatheart

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2008
9,424
6,924
113
49
Well, we were one game from winning the big 12 and being in the final eight for football. Seems pretty good to me. Reality is only 5 or 6 schools are truly competing for a national championship in football regularly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeloClone

OscarBerkshire

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2022
679
725
93
Waterloo
No! Unless you earn well over $100,000 a year and all your kids are already finished with college, you should support your school of choice through attendance and buying tickets, not NIL donations to college athletes who will likely earn more than you've ever made.

The average folks help more through metrics like butts in the seat and TV ratings. Some schools have billionaire donors, and it is simply impossible for schools without billionaire donors to keep up in the arms race.

I mean, sure, if you have expendable income that is currently being used for gambling on games or political donations, why not? However, if you're considering the price of coffee or eggs, chances are your money is better spent in your pocket.
Ur cheap and broke lmao
 

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
29,550
11,947
113
42
Lee's Summit, MO
No! Unless you earn well over $100,000 a year and all your kids are already finished with college, you should support your school of choice through attendance and buying tickets, not NIL donations to college athletes who will likely earn more than you've ever made.

The average folks help more through metrics like butts in the seat and TV ratings. Some schools have billionaire donors, and it is simply impossible for schools without billionaire donors to keep up in the arms race.

I mean, sure, if you have expendable income that is currently being used for gambling on games or political donations, why not? However, if you're considering the price of coffee or eggs, chances are your money is better spent in your pocket.
I get everyone is different with different incomes, etc. But even if everyone just donated $5 a month, it would go a long ways.