Do you guys really think that JP and ISU haven't given this a long hard look and have done studies and have come to this realization, but yet you keep debating it. Don't you think they really want to bowl in the S. endzone but are smart enough to realize that at time being it does not make sence. It's not my decision it is ISU decision and I have been saying this from day one. Keep on hating.
Evidently ISU does. This is exactly where ISU is at today. You keep talking in circles. If bowling in the endzone doesn't increase capacity how does that help building towards the highest end? You make no sence. Once again I am happy that ISU is being smart about this and not getting all emotional and blowing money. Step up and write the check.
No crickets, I don't disagree in full with what is stated. The only thing, I have never stated that attendence is the ONLY reason. Not having enough money is a given, who could argue that. When you look at the greater picture, one of the reasons ISU does not have money is because of poor attendence as a result of poor football. ISU does agree with me. At no time did I ever say it would never get bowled in. Obviously if they had the money they would do it. But sence they don't they have decided to invest it in other areas, which what I have been saying from day one. In the end they are taking the same position as me. At present it is not wise to bowl in the S. endzone given the current state of affairs. It's hard to be humble when you are correct like me. :yes:
Only edit for spelling/grammer. Never change the intent or subject of post. Otherwise some grammer nazi who can't make any points refers to a silly typo etc.
GoShow your posts seem so pissy. When's the last time you got laid, buddy?cute: Also, when you edit your posts for grammatical errors, please correct the spelling of "since" and "sense" if you could, please. I agree with your argument for the most part and believe it can best be summed up as not prudent at this juncture.
