In isolation, does this small project that will be forgotten really matter at all?
No.
Has this ruined my entire summer?
Yes.
From a macro perspective, AI is a net negative right now. (Many reasons, but that's a separate thread.) I feel the same about sports leagues being completely consumed by gambling, private equity buying teams or leagues (LIV), etc. All of these issues are obvs about $$$$$$. I get it.
Should we accept it though?
If a person becomes licensed with a school to sell products with logos, etc. they have to adhere to strict brand standards, some which can seem absolutely absurd, in order to maintain a certain level of quality and prevent reputational harm.
The gold standard for ISU is Jack Trice's story, something that shouldn't be mocked or belittled or diminished in any way, right? If an ISU licensee tried to sell a poster of Jack Trice Stadium that honors someone who died playing for the school, would it be acceptable to have it named
JACE IIIBCIGMANIA
along with a deformed I STATE logo at midfield?
Yes, some companies use AI to generate a chunk of a project, but have an actual human involved to fix or add things. If a business is asking me for attention and money while serving up slop, why should I care if they don't care?
It's like Matt Campbell said this week - ISU's best players gave up money to come back to Ames. Why? Because they care. Because ISU football/AD is full of excellent leaders who change people's lives. Because ISU fans are fantastic. Because it means something. They care, so I care.
Look at this Kansas image. How is KU's brand elevated by an image that shows deformed and dead jayhawks? Plus the video board probably needs to be censored.
No.
Has this ruined my entire summer?
Yes.
From a macro perspective, AI is a net negative right now. (Many reasons, but that's a separate thread.) I feel the same about sports leagues being completely consumed by gambling, private equity buying teams or leagues (LIV), etc. All of these issues are obvs about $$$$$$. I get it.
Should we accept it though?
If a person becomes licensed with a school to sell products with logos, etc. they have to adhere to strict brand standards, some which can seem absolutely absurd, in order to maintain a certain level of quality and prevent reputational harm.
The gold standard for ISU is Jack Trice's story, something that shouldn't be mocked or belittled or diminished in any way, right? If an ISU licensee tried to sell a poster of Jack Trice Stadium that honors someone who died playing for the school, would it be acceptable to have it named
JACE IIIBCIGMANIA
along with a deformed I STATE logo at midfield?
Yes, some companies use AI to generate a chunk of a project, but have an actual human involved to fix or add things. If a business is asking me for attention and money while serving up slop, why should I care if they don't care?
It's like Matt Campbell said this week - ISU's best players gave up money to come back to Ames. Why? Because they care. Because ISU football/AD is full of excellent leaders who change people's lives. Because ISU fans are fantastic. Because it means something. They care, so I care.
Look at this Kansas image. How is KU's brand elevated by an image that shows deformed and dead jayhawks? Plus the video board probably needs to be censored.