Well it's an Official* WBB Final Four

StClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2009
5,691
3,029
113
Wisconsin
*An Official Final Four has Stanford and UCONN

Everything is set for the Women's NCAA Final Four to grind to its finale of excessive anxiety and the chewing of painted nails. Texas A&M and Notre Dame got the call this year as sacrifical segues. Once they are predictably subdued, the magical ethereal plane is reached where titan Stanford (the near-irresistible) meets gargatuan UCONN (the immovable) to battle in an Official Women's NCAA Basketball Championship. Certainly the crowd will be raucous, the viewers rapt as UCONN once again smashes through to a place beyond the Summitt despite an increasing paucity of suspense.

Coach Auriemma senses it as he notes UCONN fans as spoiled. Though it may not show it yet, America may soon be getting gassed by UCONN's success. It's a tad bit as exciting as Iowa winning the NCAA Wrestling Championship year after year. When they finally did go down it was nothing of great lose, rather heady anticipation of Hawkeye demise shrivelled to ennui. Maybe it's a good thing. Maybe domination by a team makes news and causes a buzz.

Maybe not...as we now compare in a look over at the Men's side of the NCAA Final Four. Sure there are two big names there, UCONN and Kentucky, but they play each other and thus only ONE can move forward to the Championship. Plus, UCONN is the only one of the four teams to win in the Championship game in the past ten years. Realative newbies, last seasons pesky Butler and Cinderella VCU, are going to slug it out for sure and move on to meet one of the two biggies of either UCONN or UK. And, maybe Butler or VCU will win! An Official Final Four for men has Duke or NC (not Kansas) both vanquished.

I love the women's game, and it may be fun to watch Stanford lose again to UCONN with Maya Moore triumphantly sent to the Pros singing and playing the drums. However, as a Final Four contingency the Men quartet wins hands down this year (and maybe last) despite a regional flavor. Will dominance eventually give way to increased parity for Women as it has now in the men's game? I just don't see it as there are few really super women's players and a handfull of really great coaches. Male players and good coach seem to be found scattered through the NCAA D-1.

There is one thing to look for and cheer though if things run the predicted course: A Stanford win. They have won the NCAA Championship once and that was almost twenty years ago! So that's what I'll cheer for and miss Maya's vocals and drums.
 
Last edited:

no2cyclones

Mariner Moose
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 26, 2006
3,988
168
63
Cedar Rapids, IA
They've been good for a couple of years, on that I agree about Stanford, but can you really argue with the all-time winningest coach in Division I basketball?
 

Lyon309Cy

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2010
296
328
63
Whether Stanford has replaced Tennessee or not, the point stands that the same teams are in the finals every stinking year.
Part of it is there are fewer good players to recruit. If you land one of the 2 or 3 truly great H.S. players (Moore, Griner, C Parker, etc) you are automatically one of the top 10 programs for that year. Not just that, but unless they get injured, that blue chipper will be there for 4 years. The WNBA (or overseas) is not (nor ever will be) an attractive enough option to convince someone to jump early.
Also, I believe women basketball players are more concerned with winning and playing on great teams and being part of something special. Men's players generally seem more concerned with being 'the man' and getting recognized and having a shot at the next level. A player like Maya Moore could have gone to UTEP and instantly made that team an elite team, though maybe not a championship team, but instead she preferred to share the spotlight with Childs and some of the other great players UConn brings in for a chance to not just win but dominate.
The men's game looked this way at one point (UCLA, Indiana, UNC, Kentucky), and then the NBA started writing big checks for the type of talent that would usually go to those types of schools. And now while there are still power programs, they have to reload almost continually rather than build towards a dynasty. I'm not sure that change is ever going to happen for the WNBA, so the college game might look this way until some of the coaches at the top start retiring.
 

StClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2009
5,691
3,029
113
Wisconsin
Don't you mean Tennessee and UConn?

As noted in my opening post: "UCONN once again smashes through to a place beyond the Summitt despite an increasing paucity of suspense. "

A tip of the hat to a once great program, Stanford is now the school dueling UCONN as TENN slips.
 

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,415
47,332
113
Minnesota
You guys are all missing the point. The significance of this Final Four is the absence of Baylor. This is of the upmost importance because I hate Baylor.

PS: Did I mention I hate Baylor! :twitcy:
 

StClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2009
5,691
3,029
113
Wisconsin
Whether Stanford has replaced Tennessee or not, the point stands that the same teams are in the finals every stinking year.
YEEEE-AAAAHHHhhhhhh!!!! Stanford is out!

I am so glad I posted what was expected (UCONN vs Stanford in the Champ. game) and jinxed Stanford! Well I hope Taylor Greenfield has better luck in her four years.

Great Game A&M. You make our league proud and I salute you.
 

alaskaguy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,203
220
63
Other than the Stanford/A&M game most of the women's games have been blowouts. In this respect in differs significantly from the men's tournament.
 

StClone

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2009
5,691
3,029
113
Wisconsin
YEEEE-AAAAHHHhhhhhh!!!! Stanford is out!

I am so glad I posted what was expected (UCONN vs Stanford in the Champ. game) and jinxed Stanford! Well I hope Taylor Greenfield has better luck in her four years.

Great Game A&M. You make our league proud and I salute you.

Double Whammy! I have never been so happy to be so completely wrong. NOTRE DAME BABY vs A&M!

Hey things are real again and fun!
 

simville02

Member
Mar 25, 2009
531
19
18
35
Other than the Stanford/A&M game most of the women's games have been blowouts. In this respect in differs significantly from the men's tournament.


I respectfully have to disagree. There have been some great women's games this year.

Games within ten points for the women this year:

First Round - Kansas State/Purdue (45-53)
Penn State/Dayton (74-66)
Iowa State/Marist (64-74)
Marquette/Texas (68-65)
Texas Tech/St. Johns (50-55)
Kentucky/Hampton (66-62) *Overtime*
Iowa/Gonzaga (86-92)
UCLA/Montana (55-47)
Houston/West Virginia (73-79)
Green Bay/UARL (59-55)
Michigan State/UNI (69-66)

Second Round - Penn State/DePaul (75-73)
Marist/Duke (71-66)
Tennessee/Marquette (79-70)
Georgia Tech/Ohio State (67-60)
Oklahoma/Miami (88-83)
Temple/Notre Dame (77-64)
Louisville/Xavier (85-75)
Green Bay/Michigan State ( 65/56)
Georiga/Florida State (61-59)

Sweet 16 - UCONN/Gerogetown (68-63)
DePaul/Duke (70-63)
Tennessee/Ohio State (85-75)
Stanford/North Carolina (72-65)
Gonzaga/Louisville (76-69)
Baylor/Green Bay (86-76)

Final 4 - UConn/Notre Dame (72-63)
Stanford/Texas A&M (63-62)

That's roughtly 43% of the games coming down to 10 points or less. Also, I believe an additional 16 games were within 20 pts (68% of games with 20 pts or less). Yes, some of the games were blowouts (especially those at higher seeds -- even though many of those often ended up close too), but some very close and exciting games nonetheless.

I understand that the men's tournament overall had closer games (For the men's tournament, with more games, there were 37 games within 10 pts (54%) and 19 additional within 20 pts (82%) ), but I don't believe you can say that there were mostly blowouts in the women's tournament and not many exciting games.