In addition to the NCAA RPI, these are popular ones, including realtimerpi as already noted. The format gets lost in the copying, but you get the general info. ISU is relatively consistently rated in the top 10 among some programs that are routinely there.
As noted, it will be interesting to see how this plays out through the season, both what we have control over, and what we don't. We are in a bit different situation, as we have usually been trying to move up in RPI with what we have control over.
Women's RPI Ratings | RPIRatings.com
Rank Team W L SS Rk RPI
1. Stanford 13 1 .6809 6 .7252
2. Duke 14 1 .7017 2 .7193
3. Connecticut 15 0 .6467 17 .7187
4. LSU 12 2 .6971 3 .7076
5. Louisville 15 1 .6471 16 .7051
6. Notre Dame 13 0 .5767 59 .6801
7. Iowa St. 13 0 .5906 47 .6793
8. Tennessee 12 2 .6482 15 .6733
9. Arizona St. 12 2 .6125 31 .6684
10. Saint Joseph's 11 3 .6403 20 .6679
The Jeff Sagarin/CBN Women's College Basketball Ratings | RPIRatings.com
Women's College Basketball 2013-2014 Div I games only through games of 2014 January 5 Sunday
RATING W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 25 | VS top 50 | GOLDEN_MEAN | PREDICTOR | PURE_ELO
HOME ADVANTAGE=[ 3.65] [ 3.46] [ 3.60] [ 3.90]
1 Connecticut = 107.77 15 0 76.37( 25) 3 0 | 5 0 | 113.02 1 | 107.70 1 | 104.50 1
2 Duke = 100.22 14 1 79.97( 4) 2 1 | 6 1 | 100.23 2 | 99.93 2 | 97.61 2
3 Notre Dame = 99.34 13 0 76.41( 24) 0 0 | 4 0 | 99.77 3 | 98.79 4 | 97.17 3
4 Stanford = 98.96 13 1 80.04( 3) 3 1 | 5 1 | 98.75 4 | 98.88 3 | 96.00 4
5 Louisville = 97.21 15 1 75.57( 43) 3 1 | 5 1 | 95.99 7 | 97.43 6 | 93.90 6
6 Tennessee = 96.44 12 2 79.95( 5) 2 2 | 5 2 | 97.22 6 | 97.74 5 | 91.44 16
7 Maryland = 94.69 13 1 67.95( 200) 1 1 | 1 1 | 97.30 5 | 94.27 7 | 91.83 11
8 Iowa St. = 94.15 13 0 72.08( 98) 1 0 | 2 0 | 93.64 11 | 92.89 13 | 94.41 5
9 South Carolina = 94.06 14 1 69.53( 163) 1 1 | 2 1 | 95.89 8 | 93.50 8 | 91.61 14
10 Kentucky = 93.67 13 2 74.25( 54) 2 1 | 3 1 | 95.30 9 | 92.90 12 | 91.76 12
RealTimeRPI.com Women's College Basketball Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Ratings - A leading sports ratings and resources community on the Internet
Rank School W-L RPI SOS
Rank SOS Conf. Conf.
W-L
1 Stanford 13-1 0.7254 3 0.6505 Pac12 2-0
2 Connecticut 15-0 0.7187 8 0.6249 Aac 3-0
3 Duke 14-1 0.7175 2 0.6545 Acc 1-0
4 Louisville 15-1 0.7085 9 0.6236 Aac 3-0
5 LSU 12-2 0.7023 4 0.6447 Sec 1-0
6 Notre Dame 13-0 0.6804 42 0.5739 Acc 1-0
7 Iowa St. 13-0 0.6800 43 0.5733 Big12 2-0
8 Tennessee 12-2 0.6749 11 0.6186 Sec 1-1
9 St. Joseph's 11-3 0.6693 15 0.6177 Atl10 1-1
10 Arizona St. 12-2 0.6666 24 0.5888 Pac12 1-1
2013-2014 Women's College Basketball Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Live - WarrenNolan.com
Record Rating Percentage Index Strength of Schedule Polls
Team W L Win Pct Rank RPI Rank SOS Rank AP Coaches
Stanford 13 1 0.9286 12 0.7253 1 0.6505 3 4 4
Duke 14 1 0.9333 7 0.7192 2 0.6567 2 3 3
Connecticut 15 0 1.0000 1 0.7187 3 0.6249 7 1 1
LSU 12 2 0.8571 26 0.7093 4 0.6447 4 16 16
Louisville 15 1 0.9375 6 0.7060 5 0.6236 8 7 7
Notre Dame 13 0 1.0000 1 0.6852 6 0.5802 35 2 2
Iowa State 13 0 1.0000 1 0.6798 7 0.5730 42 14 10
Tennessee 12 2 0.8571 26 0.6734 8 0.6183 11 5 5
Saint Joseph's 11 3 0.7857 48 0.6695 9 0.6179 13 33
Arizona State 12 2 0.8571 26 0.6664 10 0.5885 24 24 25