And yet this year "staid old" Iowa State averaged 77 points per game as a team and "more fast paced" North Carolina averaged 70 points per game. Humm? As a Sophomore at ISU Donarski averaged 14 points per game and as a fifth year senior she averaged just over 10 points per gameat North Carolina. And she never again reached that 14 ppg she had at ISU while at NC.
For the last three years "more fast paced" UNC averaged 70.9 this year, 68.9 ppg last year, and 68.9 the year before. Meanwhile "staid old" CBF coached ISU scored respectively 77.1, 74.6, and 75.4 ppg. So "staid old" Iowa State scored more pounts!
But, hey, let's not let facts get in the way of our opinions!
“There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics” —
Mark Twain
Casual fans care about three "statistics":
1) How many games did the team win?
2) What place did the team finish in conference?
3) How far did the team go in the NCAA tournament?
Note: ISU WBB fans also care about beating EIU - we're 2-8 for the last decade
Nobody cares about UNC's scoring woes over the past three years. Furthermore, most fans won't give a sh!t if ISU WBB averages 85 points / game next season if they don't beat Iowa, improve their win total, win conference and see the second weekend of the NCAA Tournament.