Solar Roadways

LivntheCyLife

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
2,006
1,006
113
St. Louis, MO
This seems really silly to me. I just can't see how combining roads and solar panels is cheaper than building roads and solar panels separately. It seems even solar panels in road ditches would work better than this. You could tilt the panels to face the sun, not interrupt traffic for maintenance, not worry about a coating that's durable enough for cars but lets light through, etc.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
33
Ames, IA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H901KdXgHs4

This should help explain how silly of an idea this is. Concept, neat idea. Engineering implementation, utterly foolish.

Summary:

Traction of the road is actually questionable, especially in wet conditions.

Glass wears smooth very quickly, making traction even worse.

Roadways made of tiles crack easily, and tiles come loose after continuous use.

99% of asphalt is already made of recycled material, which is a big reason why it is so cheap and widely used.

Just the cost of the glass is $20 trillion, without any of the technology or other BS.

Would have to totally rework the power line system to fit the type of energy created by solar panels.

The light pollution from the LED lights would be pretty bad.

The LEDs can't be seen in the day so none of those lines or road markings could be seen 50% of the time.

Parking lots are full of cars during the day, blocking the sunlight. And are empty at night.



I'm about halfway through. I'll keep updating if needed haha.

The snow melting thing is total ********, the energy costs don't add up. It takes way to much energy to melt snow. Not to mention the north gets little solar energy as it is, plus it is snowing and cloudy.

Solar panels will get covered in dirt and oil, which blocks light and wears down glass, which is a very soft material. That makes the glass slicker and less clear. Both bad.

It's a much better idea just to build next to roads or even cover the roads and put panels on top of that.
 
Last edited:

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,214
7,120
113
My Playhouse
It costs too much to ever be implemented, but at the same time, would pay itself off. You'd never need snow plows/drivers, and there would be 100x less construction on roads, as the only issue would be replacing one panel with another.

Overall, the idea would work perfectly but will never have the funding to make it work. It would be nice to see it start in a small community and grow, but I'm not sure what small community would want to take the risk.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
33
Ames, IA
It costs too much to ever be implemented, but at the same time, would pay itself off. You'd never need snow plows/drivers, and there would be 100x less construction on roads, as the only issue would be replacing one panel with another.

Overall, the idea would work perfectly but will never have the funding to make it work. It would be nice to see it start in a small community and grow, but I'm not sure what small community would want to take the risk.

It couldn't possibly get the energy itself to melt snow off of it and there's a reason roads aren't made of tile already. It's not as good.

And it wouldn't pay for itself. It would have to produce like 60 trillion dollars.
 

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
24,214
7,120
113
My Playhouse
It couldn't possibly get the energy itself to melt snow off of it and there's a reason roads aren't made of tile already. It's not as good.

And it wouldn't pay for itself. It would have to produce like 60 trillion dollars.

I think eventually it would pay itself off. Would I do it? No. But it's a cool idea.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
33
Ames, IA
I think eventually it would pay itself off. Would I do it? No. But it's a cool idea.

So let's say this thing costs $60 trillion to be conservative. (It's $20 trillion just for the glass alone, not including labor to install, all of the electronics, LEDs, power grids, amount of rare minerals needed, ect)

How the hell are you going to make up $60 trillion?

Exxon Mobile is only worth about $.5 trillion TOTAL.

The largest oil companies in the world make well under $100 billion per year from what I can tell from some light googling.


There is absolutely no way it would ever pay for itself by any stretch of the imagination.
 

brianhos

Moderator
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 1, 2006
56,789
30,224
113
Trenchtown
So let's say this thing costs $60 trillion to be conservative. (It's $20 trillion just for the glass alone, not including labor to install, and of the electronics, LEDs, power grids, ect)

How the hell are you going to make up $60 trillion?

Exxon Mobile is only worth about $.5 trillion TOTAL.

The largest oil companies in the world make well under $100 billion per year from what I can tell from some light googling.


There is absolutely no way it would ever pay for itself by any stretch of the imagination.

Green energy never works when you rationalize it. It is exciting when you treat it like a religion instead.
 

Boxerdaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,270
1,329
113
47
Beaverdale, IA
This idea is obviously in its infancy so at this time makes no sense. But I think we'll see these "smart" materials in the future. I've always thought it would be great idea to do away with shingles and have solar materials replace them... Just my idea
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
33
Ames, IA
This idea is obviously in its infancy so at this time makes no sense. But I think we'll see these "smart" materials in the future. I've always thought it would be great idea to do away with shingles and have solar materials replace them... Just my idea

Solar on roofs is an infinitely better idea. That's why people have been doing it since solar was invented. I not sure they're are any cost benefits to combining then worth shingles because shingles are (relatively) cheap. You might as well just lay shingles and put panel's on top.
 

cstrunk

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2006
14,450
4,850
113
38
Longview, TX
Obviously it's a new technology that has huge obstacles to overcome, namely cost, but as with any technology it becomes cheaper in time as it is improved. And no one is going to spend $60 trillion now to implement it on everyhighway right now but it could get tested in smaller settings, like driveways and bridges that are susceptible it icing. The coolest part of it all is that it could be used for many different purposes. Obviously the solar electricity produced would not be the only potential benefit.

We need to think outside of the box withideas like this to address our world's biggest problems.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron