Social Distancing at ISU

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,641
21,019
113
Kansas just set an all-time high of 855 cases. Nationwide decline is because of the sun-belt sates that recently spiked went down in numbers

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/11/1006366/immunity-slowing-down-coronavirus-parts-us/

What is known is that after rising at an alarming pace starting in May, new cases of covid-19 in Sun Belt states like Florida have started to fall. Some of that may be due to social distancing behavior, but rising rates of immunity are also a factor, according to Youyang Gu, a computer scientist whose Covid-19 Projections is among 34 pandemic models tracked by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Immunity may play a significant part in the regions that are declining,” says Gu. At least until the fall, which is how far his models look forward, he says, “I don’t think there is going to be another spike” of infections in southern states

Yes, and rates have gone down in the Kansas counties with mask mandates (where most people live) while increasing in counties that don’t require masks. The data shows masks are helping. See article below. And of course basic common sense tells us the same.

Don’t forget those sun belt states placed major restrictions on bars and other high risk areas. That surely has helped too.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cy$

Cyientist

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 18, 2013
3,753
4,597
113
Ankeny
For this virus, it's very likely compared to others. It's why it's such a problem.

I can't get behind the herd immunity thing...cases are seeing a slight uptick in places like Italy where it was theorized that it was basically done.

I DO think way more people have it or have had it than is confirmed.

I was pretty far away from believing that we could safely get to a herd immunity level, but am starting to think we may see somewhat of a hybrid herd-immunity level to get things back under control. Society as a whole may not need to reach herd immunity levels if we keep the distancing/mask wearing protocols. Unfortunately there is a high risk to exposure group due to employment, living conditions, and behaviors that do a majority of the spreading. If that group can reach a herd immunity maybe we only need 15-20% of society instead of 40-60% to reach an immunity level where we can get this back under control and make risks minimal.

For it to work, we need to keep the distancing/mask rule in place long enough to make a difference. I also don't want to sound callous to the high risk to exposure group, I'd consider my wife in it since she is a school teacher, but it gives me hope that we can cap this thing off under 300,000 deaths instead of going back to May where we were seeing 2,000+ die per day.

For me it comes down to what is going on in New York. It was horrific what happened in the spring, but now their numbers look similar to what we are seeing in Iowa. They are probably doing a better job at mask wearing, but even so it seems like there is some sort of immunity level reached to considerably slow the spread. Once again, I'm not saying they reached an immunity level safely, just that there is a shot that the level needed may be lower than we originally thought.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BigCyFan

3GenClone

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2009
6,430
4,075
113
Des Moines
I was pretty far away from believing that we could safely get to a herd immunity level, but am starting to think we may see somewhat of a hybrid herd-immunity level to get things back under control. Society as a whole may not need to reach herd immunity levels if we keep the distancing/mask wearing protocols. Unfortunately there is a high risk to exposure group due to employment, living conditions, and behaviors that do a majority of the spreading. If that group can reach a herd immunity maybe we only need 15-20% of society instead of 40-60% to reach an immunity level where we can get this back under control and make risks minimal.

For it to work, we need to keep the distancing/mask rule in place long enough to make a difference. I also don't want to sound callous to the high risk to exposure group, I'd consider my wife in it since she is a school teacher, but it gives me hope that we can cap this thing off under 300,000 deaths instead of going back to May where we were seeing 2,000+ die per day.

For me it comes down to what is going on in New York. It was horrific what happened in the spring, but now their numbers look similar to what we are seeing in Iowa. They are probably doing a better job at mask wearing, but even so it seems like there is some sort of immunity level reached to considerably slow the spread. Once again, I'm not saying they reached an immunity level safely, just that there is a shot that the level needed may be lower than we originally thought.

Did you see what the Governor of Mississippi said about Herd Immunity? That state alone would need to triple the rate of positive cases every day for an entire year just to make it to 40% of the population.


Herd Immunity is not realistic in the short-term
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigman38

CloneJD

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2020
1,264
1,978
113
Did you see what the Governor of Mississippi said about Herd Immunity? That state alone would need to triple the rate of positive cases every day for an entire year just to make it to 40% of the population.


Herd Immunity is not realistic in the short-term


I think most estimates say there are about 10 un-diagnosed cases to every one diagnosed case. We aren't close to "immunity" by any sense but clearly the infection rate is slowing down the transmission rate in some areas. Being we are a long ways away from a widely available vaccine, it'll be interesting to see how things progress until the end of hte year.

Hopefully the combination of infection rates, social distancing, wearing masks when in close quarters with others and common sense can drive things down.
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,641
21,019
113
I think most estimates say there are about 10 un-diagnosed cases to every one diagnosed case. We aren't close to "immunity" by any sense but clearly the infection rate is slowing down the transmission rate in some areas. Being we are a long ways away from a widely available vaccine, it'll be interesting to see how things progress until the end of hte year.

Hopefully the combination of infection rates, social distancing, wearing masks when in close quarters with others and common sense can drive things down.

Those estimates say 3 to 10 depending on the area, testing etc. So it’s likely somewhere in between the two and your 10 is likely an overstatement for most of the country.

Agree on the rest of your post
 

Cyientist

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 18, 2013
3,753
4,597
113
Ankeny
Did you see what the Governor of Mississippi said about Herd Immunity? That state alone would need to triple the rate of positive cases every day for an entire year just to make it to 40% of the population.


Herd Immunity is not realistic in the short-term


Agreed. I wasn't trying to make the case that we are getting there safely, but to get this thing under control, we may be able to get there prior to hitting a 40% infected level as long as we keep distancing/mask wearing in place.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BigCyFan

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,352
25,656
113
I'm actually surprised kids in that demographic went along with social distancing rules as long as they did. This was always inevitable when you opened college campuses back up. Anyone who thought these kids would either be in class or in their dorms doesn't know 18-22 year olds.

I think they've known for a while they will be sending kids home soon. They just wanted to bring them all back so they could justify full tuition and place the blame for not having in person on the students.
 

brett108

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2010
5,257
2,140
113
Tulsa, OK
I'm actually surprised kids in that demographic went along with social distancing rules as long as they did. This was always inevitable when you opened college campuses back up. Anyone who thought these kids would either be in class or in their dorms doesn't know 18-22 year olds.

I think they've known for a while they will be sending kids home soon. They just wanted to bring them all back so they could justify full tuition and place the blame for not having in person on the students.
Lets not call them kids. By all standards they have the rights and responsibilities of an adult. I always hate calling college aged students children. They may act like children but they do no fit the definition of a child. They can and should be doing better.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,352
25,656
113
Lets not call them kids. By all standards they have the rights and responsibilities of an adult. I always hate calling college aged students children. They may act like children but they do no fit the definition of a child. They can and should be doing better.

Fair enough-- young adults.

And should they be doing better? Probably. But none of this should come as a surprise.
 

Rabbuk

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2011
56,961
46,112
113
Lets not call them kids. By all standards they have the rights and responsibilities of an adult. I always hate calling college aged students children. They may act like children but they do no fit the definition of a child. They can and should be doing better.
A lot of these "kids" would be over in Vietnam if they had been born earlier.
 

ArgentCy

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
20,403
11,146
113
Somebody doesn’t believe in personal responsibility. What about the guy in Cali who attended a party knowingly infected, then his friend got it from him and died? To me, that guy is responsible. That is just one anecdotal account and of course there are many others, but it all boils down to personal responsibility. If you know you have it and put others at risk, you are responsible for what happens.

I won’t get into the macro level on this post and address failed and incompetent govt responses.

What if they have an N95 mask on? Which clearly does nothing because it just vents the air out. What if two people breathe in their face? The problem here is that you have no idea who or when you were infected.

Now if you know you have the virus, feel like heck, and then run around screaming in people's face's that's a problem But almost no one is going to do that.
 

Spam

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 21, 2008
8,646
3,259
113
After a disastrous first few days of inviting students back to campus, it sounds like UNC decided to move all undergrad classes online.
 

brett108

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2010
5,257
2,140
113
Tulsa, OK
So the rate of infection quintupled in a week of partying? Yeah get these "kids" out of there. And stop asking the taxpayer to pay for your loans. That money seems like its going into a black hole based on the intelligent decisions alot of students appear to be making.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: isufbcurt