Agree with everything you wrote except for the bolded. The NE game would replace Iowa in alternating years. The objective is to expand local P5 rivalry without imposing an additional P5 game.-Not smart to consider another P5 OOC game if we're already playing Iowa, regardless who it is
-Cy-Hawk game should be played EVERY year, it's a huge annual event for the state. I don't care how much or little people out of state care - they should, as it's a fun rivalry to watch. This year especially.
-Nebraska would scoff at the idea, on the surface thinking they're too good to play ISU, in private knowing as long as ISU keeps improving, it's not going to be a gimme game. Plus, Nebraska is notorious for scheduling cupcakes in OOC, doubt that will change anytime soon.
-All this said, I would love to see the two teams play again (I grew up in Nebraska and got 2 degrees at ISU). If it ever lined up to play them in a bowl game, I would be there in a heartbeat.
ISU and NE both currently target a common foe leading to two separate rivalries both bitter and both involving Iowa. Both these rivalrieshave captured regional attention and are growing further in importance. There is no question that this exposure has recruiting implications as well.
However, imo the schedule benefits Iowa more so than isu allowing the Hawkeyes extra oomph in swaying recruits in iowa-nebraska neighborhood and in the general Midwest as well. It would be smart for isu to play both Iowa and ne (alternating years) to equalize this exposure and interest to recruits. Granted this isn't done with a snap of the fingers but a discussion on the merits of asking for a series with nebraska is worthwhile imo.
So should isu try to persuade ne for a ooc series? Would it be preferable to having to play Iowa every year?
See my second point: I believe the Cy-Hawk game should be held every year, therefore there would be no room to play Nebraska.Agree with everything you wrote except for the bolded. The NE game would replace Iowa in alternating years. The objective is to expand local P5 rivalry without imposing an additional P5 game.
kNU is dead to me. They bailed on the conference because they weren't competitive. Let them rot in a mediocre Big 10 West. **** Nebraska.
Iowa and Nebraska aren't rivals
Who are Iowa State's rivals?
Iowa and Iowa
Iowa's rivals are Iowa State and Iowa State
But do they consider YOU a rival? I am in Wisconsin a LOT & I don't hear as much rivalry talk about Iowa as I do about some of the Big Dogs in the B1G.Minnesota and Wisconsin are pretty big rivals of Iowa.
You started a similarly stupid trolling thread already this week, didn't you?
Short answer: No
Full answer: No, this is stupid
Color commentary - Our rivalry with Iowa is not growing in importance. 95% of the blather for this game is emotion. ISU/Texas, ISU/OU, ISU/TCU - those games are growing in importance.
I'll bet my next clone cone that CMC doesn't wake up every morning worrying about the IA/NE football recruiting corridor. If he could only recruit 10 states, IA and NE would not be in the list.
But nice attempt to try to tie Hoks into the national story that is the rise of ISU football.
Minnesota and Wisconsin are pretty big rivals of Iowa.
Lol yeah you consider Minnesota a rival and Wisconsin considers you guys a rival. If we're going that route Kansas State and West Virginia are pretty big rivals of Iowa State
Do Kansas State and West Virginia fans chant “We hate Iowa State” at games involving other opponents?.
I'd just as soon take Iowa OFF the schedule (or play them only occasionally) & add a lower-tier P5 opponent or MAC team. We have a gauntlet called the ENTIRE BIG XII, so we don't NEED to add KNu (or keep Iowa for that matter) to preserve the difficulty level of our schedule. Right now, Iowa is a beneficiary of having ISU as an "automatic" on their Non-con schedule - it definitely bolsters their SOS (at least since 2017).