So, NOW, the Big Xii needs to go out and woo the Arizona Schools, Utah and BYU.
You’re the only one then.Really surprised Pac 12 chose not to expand.
Not surprised at all that Wannstedt was full of ****
It's so frustrating that the SEC and B1G were in a position to f*** over the Big 12 and Pac-12, respectively, and Iowa State would be fine in 3 of the possible 4 scenarios:
1. Neither gets f***ed - status quo
2. Both get f***ed - Big 12 and Pac-12 leftovers merge into a league that is still at the table
3. Only Pac-12 gets f***ed - now we can consider expanding west, or not
4. Only Big 12 gets f***ed - we are f***ed
And the 4th one is the one that's gonna happen
It's so frustrating that the SEC and B1G were in a position to f*** over the Big 12 and Pac-12, respectively, and Iowa State would be fine in 3 of the possible 4 scenarios:
1. Neither gets f***ed - status quo
2. Both get f***ed - Big 12 and Pac-12 leftovers merge into a league that is still at the table
3. Only Pac-12 gets f***ed - now we can consider expanding west, or not
4. Only Big 12 gets f***ed - we are f***ed
And the 4th one is the one that's gonna happen
Nobody ****** anybody. This was exactly what every single one of us said they were going to say. They even said the three key words "at this time" like we anticipated. This is FAR from over.
Who is going to touch the Big 12 until the OU/TX stuff is over. If you think realignment is over, you are kidding yourself. This stuff will be active for years.Really surprised Pac 12 chose not to expand.
Not surprised at all that Wannstedt was full of ****
To expand on my previous thought, let's say they can negotiate with Fox with the idea that they will be adding a certain number of schools. Let's say the new payout will start at $35 million per school and escalate to $50 million at the end of the contract.
Once the settlement is reached with OU and UT, whatever teams the PAC 12 (or Big Ten for that matter) have their eyes on will have that financial windfall that allows them to accept a 50% share for a few years, then $75%, etc until they get up to a full share.
I'm not even arguing this idea can't ultimately prove true. Just that it rests on a lot of trust and goodwill between people who might have some shred of common interest but no historical working relationship, and it depends on a lot of things happening that might not happen.
So, NOW, the Big Xii needs to go out and woo the Arizona Schools, Utah and BYU.
Yep, everything hinges on the resolution of the OU/UT situation. If ESPN wants their new prizes into their prized league earlier, they will have to pony up. Until then, Mr. Luck is probably telling everyone else to hold tight, and let the Hateful 8 lawyers do their thing.As most of us said for a while now. There is NOTHING they can say except "we aren't expanding at this time" if any potential expansion plans were to include the Big 12.
Does this mean the WILL expand? No. There will be two trigger points that will likely influence the PAC 12, ACC and Big 10 to re-evaluate expansion. The first big one is having clarity on the legal issues of OU, UT and ESPN.
There are no schools of the remaining that can afford to put themselves in a GoR bind, as they will be asked by any of these conferences to forgo some media rights for a period. So there can be no expansion with remaining Big 12 teams until the current GoR mess with UT and OU is clear.
This was the ONLY thing that could be said.
This statement was 100% predictable, and the poor conclusions and panic drawn from it is as well.
Everybody needs to chill out. ESPN has incredible motivation to get a majority of the remaining teams placed into power conferences or help ensure a new Big 12 is at a power conference level with access to CFP, likely autobid in a 12 team scenario.
Head on over and spend some time in the Wanstadt thread as that seems to be where it has been discussed. That's probably a sentence that has never been typed in the history of mankind.