We don't even have 500-page threads dedicated to ISU stuff... The only reason threads are that long is because the UI fans usually re-bump those threads repeatedly, including when new threads come around.Considering you are worth 150+ pages to this ******** yourself, maybe quit being such an insecure ***** and support your own team instead of running down a team you don't care about
You should just call them out, no need to protect that poster. If you really don't feel like calling them out, you could just link it.I'll let one your fellow hok fans take credit for that one if he wants to do so. He posts on CF quite often.
I wouldn't be surprised if ISU wins, but I don't see them scoring more than 30 points. With the exception of the triple OT game ISU hasn't reached 30 points in this matchup since 2002.
Since this is a prediction thread though I will go with Iowa 31 ISU 17. I expect Iowa's DL and LB to contain the ISU offense for the most part. Put pressure on Park and make him throw under duress. He's not very accurate so I hope Iowa blitzes early and often (wishful thinking).
Park is actually pretty accurate
I guess it depends on your definition of accurate. He only completed more than 56% of his passes in three games: San Jose State, Kansas, and Texas Tech. Those were also arguably their three easiest games depending how you view UNI.
Believe me when I say WR drops were a factor.I guess it depends on your definition of accurate. He only completed more than 56% of his passes in three games: San Jose State, Kansas, and Texas Tech. Those were also arguably their three easiest games depending how you view UNI.
I guess it depends on your definition of accurate. He only completed more than 56% of his passes in three games: San Jose State, Kansas, and Texas Tech. Those were also arguably their three easiest games depending how you view UNI.
Iowa will be 1-2 in non con and struggle to win 3 to 4 more conference games against a week schedule.I also think Wyoming beats Iowa. There, I said it.
There were a lot of really good passing offenses in the Big 12. So it hurt defensive ratings. The bowl games exposed the Big 10 has a defense optional league.I could have completed 60%+ against the #125 (Tech), #114 (kState), #111 (OU), #104 (WVU) pass defenses in the nation.
The best pass defense Park faced in the Big12 was Kansas. LOL, this is serious, Kansas had the best pass D in the Big12 at #54. YIKES, talk about a defense optional league!
There were a lot of really good passing offenses in the Big 12. So it hurt defensive ratings. The bowl games exposed the Big 10 has a defense optional league.
Facing great pass offenses every week will definitely skew the numbers. Eight Big 12 teams in the top 50. Purdue, Indiana and Penn State for you. Lol, Purdue had the best pass offense in the B1G at #21. Yikes talk about offense optional league.I could have completed 60%+ against the #125 (Tech), #114 (kState), #111 (OU), #104 (WVU) pass defenses in the nation.
The best pass defense Park faced in the Big12 was Kansas. LOL, this is serious, Kansas had the best pass D in the Big12 at #54. YIKES, talk about a defense optional league!
I'm stating facts. Clearly you guys can't get it the first or the hundredth time, so we will just keep telling you the facts until you get it or go away. I don't care who's "material" it is, I will tell you the truth when you spew nonsense.Again, get your own material.