NCAA source: "Unprecedented" penalties against Penn State

Emmert was given permission to go solely off the Freeh report. And while you may think that punishments vetted out based on the Freeh report are inappropriate, Penn St agreed to them.

Not according to the CNN article:

"NCAA President Mark Emmert wrote a letter to Penn State President Rodney Erickson in November that included four questions he wanted the university to answer.

According to the source, the NCAA felt the questions were answered by the Freeh report and therefore it could act before the university responded.

The source wasn't sure if the university has been made aware of the penalties yet but says the university was not involved in the decision. It was "not a negotiated process," the source said."
 
Not according to the CNN article:

"NCAA President Mark Emmert wrote a letter to Penn State President Rodney Erickson in November that included four questions he wanted the university to answer.

According to the source, the NCAA felt the questions were answered by the Freeh report and therefore it could act before the university responded.

The source wasn't sure if the university has been made aware of the penalties yet but says the university was not involved in the decision. It was "not a negotiated process," the source said."


Sounds like Emmert is power hungry, as Andy Staples maintains:

"Penn State will get penalized Monday. Then what? What happens the next time the agreed-upon process moves too slow for Emmert and he decides to play judge, jury and executioner for a different school?"

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...-penn-state-decision/index.html#ixzz21PbFuIBM
 
Seriously. I still want to know. The administrators (and Paterno) who were responsible are all gone. Not only that, but they are liable for at least civil suits, if not criminal negligence (or dead). So, why punish those who are innocent of any wrongdoing themselves?

Sorry but if your employer does something so terrible, guess what....the employees get punished. Should Enron have been allowed to return to business as normal once the board was replaced? Hell no.

Life isn't fair. It's too bad for the people who relies on Penn State to make a living but if you don't bring the hammer down on them...it just encourages other schools to cover things up because they know nothing will happen to them.
 
What happens the next time the agreed-upon process moves too slow for Emmert and he decides to play judge, jury and executioner for a different school?"

Since when does the NCAA moves fast?
 
Sounds like Emmert is power hungry, as Andy Staples maintains:

"Penn State will get penalized Monday. Then what? What happens the next time the agreed-upon process moves too slow for Emmert and he decides to play judge, jury and executioner for a different school?"

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...-penn-state-decision/index.html#ixzz21PbFuIBM

Yeah, and based on Andy's past work, it definitely doesn't sound like he has some sort of axe to grind with the NCAA.

People have been complaining for years about the NCAA being spineless, and now that they're finally doing something to mitigate that, Andy Staples complains that they're not taking their sweet time to do their own investigation that would likely duplicate the results achieved over several months by the former head of the FBI. What could the NCAA's own investigation find that could possibly lessen the well-deserved hammer Penn State's about to receive?
 
Did I miss the offical NCAA investigation into this mess? Is Emmert really relying on reading the Freeh report to apply sanctions so severe? I don't think that's enough, frankly.

yeah because the NCAA could do a much better investigation than a op FBI official . pirate
 
yeah because the NCAA could do a much better investigation than a op FBI official . pirate


Ummm....You do realize that the FBI is still investigating, right? Sandusky taking one of the victims to the Alamo Bowl is a federal crime in and of itself.

I think that psu is trying to get the NCAA part over with as quickly as they can. That way they can plan for the future.

The next step will be the feds coming after them, FBI and the SEC and IRS concerning some of the business deals that these folks had together. That will of course will be followed by all of the civil litigation from the victims.

This is just the beginning of the real pain for psu. They need to know what they will have, program wise, so they can plan for the rest accordingly.
 
Going to prison isn't incentive? But losing scholarships and bowl games will be?

If prison time were the big deterrent you claim we wouldn't be having this conversation in the first place. People already go to jail for child molestation and covering up crimes. But somehow this time people going to jail will magically be a deterrent. :nah:

It's nothing but a BIG FINE:

No ‘death penalty,' but a big fine for Penn State - Omaha.com


My problem this is that Penn State is a REALLY BIG institution, they'll just have a big fund-raising drive and pay this off in a week. I just knew the NCAA would **** this up big-time.

The fine is only one component. If Omaha.com is claiming that's all the punishment is then they're full of **** because the NCAA hasn't released their punishment yet.
 
Chill out, man. Jeez louise. I haven't seen anybody here defending Sandusky, Paterno, Spanier, etc. I think Penn St. should be punished harshly, but to label people who didn't do anything wrong as undefendable is vindictive. Every single FBS program has a culture that demands winning, and can be susceptible to something like this. If you change that, I just think people should look at themselves first, and see how much they put CFB or any sport on a pedestal.

Got it. I was being overly dramatic in response to AClone's over-the-top postings about me. Don't blame you if you haven't read the whole thread!
 
I love the ESPN mantra, "its going to be worse than the death penalty." I'm fully expecting to be underwhelmed by the NCAA.