NCAA source: "Unprecedented" penalties against Penn State

what is interesting in reading the PSU board(really should get to work), is how many of them are telling each other to accept this, because they do not want a deeper investigation which could actually lead to more condemning or worse information.
 
I think you are right. They will still cling to the past. HOWEVER, I think younger guys that are impressionable right now(mid-high school/junior high, etc) will think twice about going to PSU down the road. If they are not a relevant football school over the period of the next 5-8 years, they won't be looking to go there. The school has benefited being a national power of tradition. They may still get recruits from their region that are high level, but I bet the kids outside their region who have offers from OSU, Florida, USC, etc. won't consider PSU tops on their list anymore. The problem is, there really isn't any other national power school in the upper NE.

Ha, they'd take 5 to 8 right now and be ecstatic.

This will make SMU look like a slap on the wrist.
 
I expected better from you.
My post was not about innocent people being harmed by punishment, but innocent people being punished. No one is suggesting those that committed the crimes, Spanier, Joe Pa, etc, not to be punished (murder example). Enron is analogous to the NCAA giving SMU the death penalty, and has little in common with the PSU case.

Removing the huge jurisdiction question, it is about the economics of punishment. Does punishing those left at PSU (punishing the innocent): a.)punish those who did commit crimes b.)prevent future Joe Pa's from acting selfishly? No to the former, and thus no to the latter. The NCAA's punishment, like usual, will be inflicted only on those who had no part in the crimes.

This isn't about punishing individuals, no individuals were mentioned in the press conference today, the criminal justice system will take care of that. This is about an association punishing one of its member institutions. Penn State was the recipient of the punishment, not specific people. You need to understand that distinction. Penn State, as an institution, ****ed up and ****ed up badly. So yes, punishing Penn State does punish the institution that broke the bylaws and constitution of the NCAA And yes, it probably will prevent people with a vested interest in their institution from behaving in this manner in the future.
 
Ha, they'd take 5 to 8 right now and be ecstatic.

This will make SMU look like a slap on the wrist.

SMU was a small private school who also dealt with increased admission requirements and conference realignment in the aftermath of the death penalty.

Penn St has all the resources to overcome this quicker than you think. They will still be an elite jobe once O'Brien is fired in 3-4 years.
 
I see Penn St coming out of this stronger than before. The penalties are significant but Penn St has underachieved the last decade or so due to having a figure head as of a head coach. This will be an elite job once the sanctions are in place. The facilities, recruiting location and history won't just disappear. I fully expect the Penn St fan base to rally around the teams the next few years and donations to increase as well.

+1.
 
I cannot say this in strong enough words. But I will try.

Having to watch sub-par football is not a punishment.

Setting up a business to be successful because of the presence of a successful athletics program comes with a certain amount of risk. Among those risks is the fact that the program may no longer be successful in the future. This is part of business. Saying that the businesses that may suffer as a result of this may suffer and that that "isn't fair" is like saying that someone who put all of their money into a Mark McGuire baseball card for their children's education fund shouldn't loose that money if McGuire cards suddenly depreciate because McGuire used a ton of steroids, because it "isn't fair." I'm sorry, it isn't fair, but that's business. A bunch of people lost money on the housing market. Businesses fail because of a hundred and one different reasons. If Penn State football is the only way that your business stays afloat, than you took the risk (that Penn State football may not be able to keep you afloat) with the benefit (that Penn State football brings in a lot of money).

This mindset (the NCAA can't act against the most horrific abuse of power by an athletic institution in memory) is akin to saying that it is ok for ISU to pay players to come play football, because Hickory Park would get more business if Iowa State was better at football.

I'm actually taken aback that I even have to make this point.


this. Who are the "innocent victims" of the sanctions that I keep hearing about? The players who are allowed to transfer, penalty free? The fans? Who might have to watch a few years of ****** football or do something else on the weekends?

Or the young boys, who had their lives destroyed by a despicable POS and the administration who covered it up for him and refused to stand up for the helpless?

It is sickening to hear about the fans and players referred to as "victims". Disgusting.
 
I guess if "unprecedented" means "two slaps on the wrist", then this qualifies.

This will do absolutely nothing for those "culture changes" that the NCAA says are needed, and the whole vacating wins thing is insultingly meaningless.
 
what is interesting in reading the PSU board(really should get to work), is how many of them are telling each other to accept this, because they do not want a deeper investigation which could actually lead to more condemning or worse information.

The wiser of the bunch who actually realize how easily PSU got off today compared to what could/should have happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uro cy
Ha, they'd take 5 to 8 right now and be ecstatic.

This will make SMU look like a slap on the wrist.
Really, because SMU is now in a much lesser conference and hasn't been relevant in 25 years. PSU has the facilities, fans and $$ to make a speedy recovery.
 
this. Who are the "innocent victims" of the sanctions that I keep hearing about? The players who are allowed to transfer, penalty free? The fans? Who might have to watch a few years of ****** football or do something else on the weekends?

Or the young boys, who had their lives destroyed by a despicable POS and the administration who covered it up for him and refused to stand up for the helpless?

It is sickening to hear about the fans and players referred to as "victims". Disgusting.
Maybe its time for them to reflect about the real purpose of a university. Hint: its not 7 or 8 fall Saturdays, and trying to help a few kids get a shot at the NFL. Collegiate athletics should be considered a privilege, not a right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The wiser of the bunch who actually realize how easily PSU got off today compared to what could/should have happened.

Don't forget that the criminal trials of the PSU administrators are still pending and that the NCAA has reserved the right to hand down further punishment after those proceedings are complete.

Also, the $73 million dollars in fines that were levied today will hopefully be pocket change in comparison to what they will lose in the civil court battles.
 
Maybe its time for them to reflect about the real purpose of a university. Hint: its not 7 or 8 fall Saturdays, and trying to help a few kids get a shot at the NFL. Collegiate athletics should be considered a privilege, not a right.

This cannot be bolded enough.
 
Don't forget that the criminal trials of the PSU administrators are still pending and that the NCAA has reserved the right to hand down further punishment after those proceedings are complete.

Also, the $73 million dollars in fines that were levied today will hopefully be pocket change in comparison to what they will lose in the civil court battles.


i'm sure the amounts will never be made public, but it's going to be huge
 
Don't forget that the criminal trials of the PSU administrators are still pending and that the NCAA has reserved the right to hand down further punishment after those proceedings are complete.

Also, the $73 million dollars in fines that were levied today will hopefully be pocket change in comparison to what they will lose in the civil court battles.

I guess we watch it play out. As Skyh13 said above, I don't really see how anything the NCAA did today is going to affect culture change at PSU.
 
The wiser of the bunch who actually realize how easily PSU got off today compared to what could/should have happened.

I think you're so hung up on the death penalty that Pedo State didn't get that you don't realize just how bad it's going to be for them. It'd be one thing if a name coach were still coaching them, they'd probably weather the storm a lot better. And okay, fine, they recruited well this off season before any punishments went down. But I think you are underplaying the importance of the 4 year bowl ban and the loss of scholarships. Once again, if a quality coach were coaching them, they'd better survive it. But you have a relatively unknown coaching staff coaching who knows who by the end of the week. And it's going to be hard to replace players with all those scholarship cuts.

Perhaps they will survive this. But I just don't think so.
 
I think you're so hung up on the death penalty that Pedo State didn't get that you don't realize just how bad it's going to be for them. It'd be one thing if a name coach were still coaching them, they'd probably weather the storm a lot better. And okay, fine, they recruited well this off season before any punishments went down. But I think you are underplaying the importance of the 4 year bowl ban and the loss of scholarships. Once again, if a quality coach were coaching them, they'd better survive it. But you have a relatively unknown coaching staff coaching who knows who by the end of the week. And it's going to be hard to replace players with all those scholarship cuts.

Perhaps they will survive this. But I just don't think so.

It will be no piece of cake, but they will survive, and as CyJack13 said above, likely come out better on the other side.

Perhaps you (and others here) don't appreciate how money (on the level that PSU donors can generate it) can fix just about anything in college football. PSU needed to come through today with one thing...PSU still playing football. With the football progam still alive, the money will continue to come it.

The bowl ban is largely a non-factor. Good FB players primarily want an avenue into professional ranks, and PSU is still well positioned to do that.

The blind loyalty will afford them enough walk-ons to hang on.

When the time comes 3-4 years down the road, PSU will flash money and they'll get the coach they need. Once they get the coach, the recruits will follow.

Standing by my earlier prediction...barring any further NCAA sanctions, PSU will be back in a bowl within two years of the sanctions ending. And judging by the PSU reaction today, I'll give you another prediction...the JoePa shrine will be back up within 15 years.
 
Last edited:
It will be no piece of cake, but they will survive, and as CyJack13 said above, likely come out better on the other side.

Perhaps you (and others here) don't appreciate how money (on the level that PSU donors can generate it) can fix just about anything in college football. PSU needed to come through today with one thing...PSU still playing football. With the football progam still alive, the money will continue to come it.

The bowl ban is largely a non-factor. Good FB players primarily want an avenue into professional ranks, and PSU is still well positioned to do that.

The blind loyalty will afford them enough walk-ons to hang on.

When the time comes 3-4 years down the road, PSU will flash money and they'll get the coach they need. Once they get the coach, the recruits will follow.

Standing by my earlier prediction...barring any further NCAA sanctions, PSU will be back in a bowl within two years of the sanctions ending. And judging by the PSU reaction today, I'll give you another prediction...the JoePa shrine will be back up within 15 years.

I might buy this - if USC remained a juggernaut during their probation. But they didn't - it was a real rough patch for them, and they didn't get smacked around nearly as badly as Penn St did.

I might also buy this more if empires didn't crumble all the time. In the early years of the Big 12 Texas wasn't that great of a program, and they're not the program they were in the mid 2000s. A&M has been a joke for the last decade. Nebraska may never be what they once were ever again. Notre Dame hasn't been anything special in the last 20 years. Michigan, Ohio St, Miami, Florida St, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, all schools that are reputed on the same level as Penn St, have all had down periods, most of them without NCAA smackdowns. But according to you, this cannot possibly happen because money and tradition win the day.

The problem with your argument is that money and tradition AREN'T everything. They help a great deal, certainly in the road to recovery, but if the team is incapable of winning then it all means nothing. The route to the pros that you claim is all that matters becomes much more pitted if the team is incapable of winning. And winning at Penn St is going to be much harder, considering the defections, to include existing roster members and recruits, has already begun according to ESPN. Guess those bowl games mean more to the players than you thought.