An interesting Reader’s Watchdog Q&A in the Des Moines Register today:
Q: How high can your Iowa property taxes go? A: Pretty darn high
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/s...y-taxes-limits-appeal-process-iowa/528335002/
Abel Island wasn’t an island at all when Chris Zearley’s grandfather bought land near Guttenberg in the 1930s.
Now riverfront property, some of that land, in far northeast Iowa, has more than doubled in price in the past couple of years — from $404,855 in 2014 to $1.1 million in 2016.
Zearley and his sisters, who inherited the land, can thank those who have built much more swanky weekend homes on the island for that jump in price.
The three can scarcely afford the 113 percent increase in property taxes that has come with the hike in assessed value: From $7,764 to $16,564 a year.
“My question is: Is there a limit on the amount that taxes are allowed to be raised year over year?” Zearley, of Tucson, Ariz., wrote Reader's Watchdog.
“It seems to me that these increases are so substantial (more than doubling in just two years) that there should be some limits set by the state so people are not forced to sell their land just to pay the taxes.” . . . .
*****
I heard from a good source that Allemakee
There is more discussion there.
Maybe I’m not understanding all the detail, but I’m not sure all the math or the figures in the article are correct (the ones regarding Iowa law). There might be a typo — or perhaps it could have been explained better for those not intimately familiar with Iowa property tax.
The general answer is that rollback helps against a general increase in prices, or price inflation, but not on a property specific basis.
The kind of price increase mentioned in the article, though, is likely not simply, or just, the result of market forces. Price increases as the result of monetary inflation are not uniform. As I said above, the winners are those who receive the new money first.
You can find out more about Iowa property tax law at the links below — which include recent articles. I think what is going on in Iowa law now is an effort to put residential rental and commercial properties on the same basis as residential, a reform which passed a couple years ago. To do that, though, the state was to reimburse localities somehow for the lost revenue (for a period at least). And right at the moment, it seems possible that amount will be reduced or eliminated by the state legislature.
Abel Island wasn’t an island at all when Chris Zearley’s grandfather bought land near Guttenberg in the 1930s.
Now riverfront property, some of that land, in far northeast Iowa, has more than doubled in price in the past couple of years — from $404,855 in 2014 to $1.1 million in 2016.
Zearley and his sisters, who inherited the land, can thank those who have built much more swanky weekend homes on the island for that jump in price.
The three can scarcely afford the 113 percent increase in property taxes that has come with the hike in assessed value: From $7,764 to $16,564 a year.
“My question is: Is there a limit on the amount that taxes are allowed to be raised year over year?” Zearley, of Tucson, Ariz., wrote Reader's Watchdog.
“It seems to me that these increases are so substantial (more than doubling in just two years) that there should be some limits set by the state so people are not forced to sell their land just to pay the taxes.” . . . .
*****
There is more discussion there.
Maybe I’m not understanding all the detail, but I’m not sure all the math or the figures in the article are correct (the ones regarding Iowa law). There might be a typo — or perhaps it could have been explained better for those not intimately familiar with Iowa property tax.
The general answer is that rollback helps against a general increase in prices, or price inflation, but not on a property specific basis.
The kind of price increase mentioned in the article, though, is likely not simply, or just, the result of market forces. Price increases as the result of monetary inflation are not uniform. As I said above, the winners are those who receive the new money first.
You can find out more about Iowa property tax law at the links below — which include recent articles. I think what is going on in Iowa law now is an effort to put residential rental and commercial properties on the same basis as residential, a reform which passed a couple years ago. To do that, though, the state was to reimburse localities somehow for the lost revenue (for a period at least). And right at the moment, it seems possible that amount will be reduced or eliminated by the state legislature.