Goodbye Jared...

TitanClone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 21, 2008
3,600
2,960
113
That's dumb.

Most people understand that they aren't going to lose as much weight as him. It happened so why can't subway use it?????
 

FDWxMan

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,131
1,124
113
Des Moines
Probably a good thing...though I think I'd much rather watch a "Jared" Subway commercial then have to sit through that obnoxious "$5 Dollar Footlong" jingle one more time. :skeptical:
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,893
25,031
113
Well there goes half of nutrisystems advertisements. As well as bowflex. Does this affect infomercials as well? That would really hurt the "work from home for 5 hours a week and become a millionaire" shows. I was just thinking, maybe I could do that.
 

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,911
8,461
113
Ames
Yay! No more Viagra ads!
Posted via Mobile Device
 

Ms3r4ISU

Me: Mea culpa. Also me: Sine cura sis.
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 7, 2008
12,911
8,461
113
Ames
Matching bathtubs in the middle of nowhere? Oh, you mean what happens after the commercial is over...
Posted via Mobile Device
 

SeattleClone

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,188
452
83
There goes Butters' career too...

107a.jpg
 

AIT

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
2,743
101
63
Johnston, IA
I don't know how big of a change this would be. It sounds like they'd just have to add "typical results are ___" to their disclaimer.

I think Jared's results are typical, provided you're a 400-pound fast food junkie who suddenly starts eating nothing but a veggie sub for lunch and dinner.
 

jumbopackage

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2007
5,479
249
63
I don't know how big of a change this would be. It sounds like they'd just have to add "typical results are ___" to their disclaimer.

I think Jared's results are typical, provided you're a 400-pound fast food junkie who suddenly starts eating nothing but a veggie sub for lunch and dinner.
That's what they are trying to get away from. They won't be able to show atypical results without showing typical ones.

They won't be able to just make a disclaimer at the end of their ad and make it all better after they show the guy who went from flab to a 6 pack in 3 months.
 

cmoneyr

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2006
8,422
343
83
41
Ames, Born and Raised
I don't know how big of a change this would be. It sounds like they'd just have to add "typical results are ___" to their disclaimer.

I think Jared's results are typical, provided you're a 400-pound fast food junkie who suddenly starts eating nothing but a veggie sub for lunch and dinner.
Commercials already have "results not typical" or whatever on the bottom. This would make it so that's not enough from the sound of it.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,841
14,802
113
Iowa
So people better not advertise basketball shoes because not everyone who wears them can dunk. People better not advertise baseball bats because not everyone can hit homeruns like in commercials. People better not advertise colognes or any type of clothing because not everyone can attract the opposite sex.
 

jumbopackage

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2007
5,479
249
63
So people better not advertise basketball shoes because not everyone who wears them can dunk. People better not advertise baseball bats because not everyone can hit homeruns like in commercials. People better not advertise colognes or any type of clothing because not everyone can attract the opposite sex.
That's not it at all. They just can't advertise that shows will increase your vertical leap by a foot, or that the bat will make you hit the ball 50 feet further, or that cologne will get you laid if it doesn't actually do it.

It's just about making it so ads can't just blatantly lie about what their product is capable of and fix it by saying "results not typical" at the end. It's really just a minor adjustment to the existing rules.
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,706
3,726
113
Arizona
So people better not advertise basketball shoes because not everyone who wears them can dunk. People better not advertise baseball bats because not everyone can hit homeruns like in commercials. People better not advertise colognes or any type of clothing because not everyone can attract the opposite sex.

Sounds about right. Stupid ******* federal government.

Just show a picture of the item with the price. Voice reads, "Buy this, its good." This ad brought you by big brother, because you are such a ******* moron you need to be protected from the big bad marketing people.
 

cmoneyr

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2006
8,422
343
83
41
Ames, Born and Raised
Sounds about right. Stupid ******* federal government.

Just show a picture of the item with the price. Voice reads, "Buy this, its good." This ad brought you by big brother, because you are such a ******* moron you need to be protected from the big bad marketing people.
Been awhile since I've seen someone so epically misunderstand something.
 

AIT

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
2,743
101
63
Johnston, IA
That's not it at all. They just can't advertise that shows will increase your vertical leap by a foot, or that the bat will make you hit the ball 50 feet further, or that cologne will get you laid if it doesn't actually do it.

It's just about making it so ads can't just blatantly lie about what their product is capable of and fix it by saying "results not typical" at the end. It's really just a minor adjustment to the existing rules.

If that's all it does then diet pills and nutritional supplements might be the only things affected. It always bugged me that they could make wild claims as long as they added "results not typical" and "these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA." Who decides what is typical? The typical Bowflex owner doesn't get completely ripped, but if that typical owner uses it for 4 hours every day he would.