Whether or not you feel a quake depends on a lot of different things: where exactly you are (like on the ground, in a reinforced concrete building, in a skyscraper, etc., or in a mountainous area with a lot of sold rock or land that is flat, mostly soil or sand, which will carry the earthquake waves more easily); what kind of shock wave is created by the quake (a hard jolt - which I believe is called a 'p' wave - that is more easily felt at lower magnitudes or an 's' wave, which is more of a rolling motion); how far you are from the epicenter or if you're near the fault that may have caused a quake, but not necessarily near the epicenter, among other things.
In 1989, I lived in Santa Rosa, California during the 6.9 Loma Prieta quake which had an epicenter southwest of San Jose, or ~120 miles from where I was. There was no significant damage in Santa Rosa. But the city is built on an dry lake bed, so it's very sandy, loose ground which amplifies the waves of a quake. AND the building I worked in that afternoon was specifically built to *move* during a quake as it was constructed using base isolation so that the foundation was not rigidly fixed to the ground. So we REALLY rocked and rolled as the shockwave moved through, but the building did exactly what it was supposed to do in a quake - move. Items IN the building weren't as lucky, however. I had to hold onto the counters to keep my balance. Loma Prieta was felt as far south as the northern LA suburbs, east to Reno, and north to Eureka.
An interesting clip from the 5:00 newscast on October 17, 1989, out of Sacramento, the studio is still shaking from the quake as they come back from their first commercial break. A short time into the clip, the anchors are on the phone with a reporter of theirs who was covering the World Series at Candlestick Park in San Francisco and he describes what he felt and informs them of the first news of a section of the Bay Bridge collapsing. Interesting stuff (to me, anyway).