And then you have sigmapolis weird narrative that the Hoiberg era was actually similar to......Wayne Morgan...
Way to miss the point. Hoiberg made the tournament. But so did Johnny, Floyd, Larry, and... Wayne. The loveable clown Wayne Morgan may we all call him when we need satellite dish service.
The point? Making the tournament is more the rule than the exception for successful Iowa State coaches. Even relatively unsuccessful ones (Prohm and Morgan) made the NCAA tournament on their own once.
If you want to sunshine pump the (very good!) Hoiberg era as the "best ever," then you are going to have to come up with some accomplishments that truly stand out from the rest of program history.
The Hoiberg era was excellent, probably the second-best in school history, but nothing in it compared to the heights achieved by the Fizer-Tinsley team in winning the Big 12 regular season twice and having a path to a national title to the point they probably
should have been able to do it that year.
all because he treats efficiency ratings as the only way to measure the success of a season. And a weird devotion to minimizing the success of Hoiberg.
So those Big 12 title banners hanging in Hilton that Larry, Marcus, and Jamaal brought us are "just efficiency stats?" You might want to try again. I use the efficiency stats for context, but I am well aware of the discreet W/L accomplishments of teams, too, and the good Larry teams were the best there.
The fanbase is over Hoiberg leaving. I'm not sure what sigmapolis is talking about with the Jurassic Park metaphor. That's about as off base as I've seen him since he said Hoiberg went to "a couple tourneys". So much for data guiding his narratives.
Somebody starts a thread saying "Prohm resurfaces/is alive" and somehow like the next three posts could be summarized as "**** that guy." Yeah, we're
totally over Hoiberg leaving,
totally.
The lady doth protest too much.